2015-03-27 7:57 GMT+01:00 Cecil Westerhof :
> 2015-03-26 23:19 GMT+01:00 Cecil Westerhof :
>
>> 2015-03-26 22:49 GMT+01:00 Nick Dokos :
>>
>>> Cecil Westerhof writes:
>>>
>>> > In this way I do not get an empty column. It would be better when K
>>> > would put between and below H and I, but I th
2015-03-26 23:19 GMT+01:00 Cecil Westerhof :
> 2015-03-26 22:49 GMT+01:00 Nick Dokos :
>
>> Cecil Westerhof writes:
>>
>> > In this way I do not get an empty column. It would be better when K
>> > would put between and below H and I, but I think I can live with it.
>> >
>>
>> Just put I after K
2015-03-26 22:49 GMT+01:00 Nick Dokos :
> Cecil Westerhof writes:
>
> > In this way I do not get an empty column. It would be better when K
> > would put between and below H and I, but I think I can live with it.
> >
>
> Just put I after K and the subgraph.
>
That works. It is even better whe
Cecil Westerhof writes:
>
> In this way I do not get an empty column.
You can make the rows be of size 0:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
#+BEGIN_SRC dot :file test2.svg :cmdline -Kdot -Tsvg
graph foo {
row1--row2--row3--row4 [style="invis", fixedsize="true",
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> In this way I do not get an empty column. It would be better when K
> would put between and below H and I, but I think I can live with it.
>
Just put I after K and the subgraph.
Nick
2015-03-26 21:27 GMT+01:00 Nick Dokos :
> Cecil Westerhof writes:
>
> > I was asked to make a diagram and was thinking that dot in org-mode
> could be a good idea.
> >
> > I got reasonably fast the following:
> > > This is a good deal in the right direction, but a few things should be
> differen
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> I was asked to make a diagram and was thinking that dot in org-mode could be
> a good idea.
>
> I got reasonably fast the following:
> This is a good deal in the right direction, but a few things should be
> different:
> - E should be left of F
> - resource should go
2015-03-26 17:57 GMT+01:00 Cecil Westerhof :
> 2015-03-26 17:07 GMT+01:00 Ken Mankoff :
>
>>
>> On 2015-03-26 at 11:52, e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
>> > The graphviz tools are fantastic for quick and dirty graphs but the
>> > layout algorithms are not easily controlled... I would highly
>> > recommen
2015-03-26 18:00 GMT+01:00 Thomas S. Dye :
> Cecil Westerhof writes:
>
> > I was asked to make a diagram and was thinking that dot in org-mode could
> > be a good idea.
> >
> > I got reasonably fast the following:
> > #+BEGIN_SRC dot :file test.svg :cmdline -Kdot -Tsvg
> > graph {
> >
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> I was asked to make a diagram and was thinking that dot in org-mode could
> be a good idea.
>
> I got reasonably fast the following:
> #+BEGIN_SRC dot :file test.svg :cmdline -Kdot -Tsvg
> graph {
> utilities [label = "Utility's"]
>
> A
> B
>
2015-03-26 17:07 GMT+01:00 Ken Mankoff :
>
> On 2015-03-26 at 11:52, e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
> > The graphviz tools are fantastic for quick and dirty graphs but the
> > layout algorithms are not easily controlled... I would highly
> > recommend tikz ...
>
> Or perhaps ditaa.
>
It is certainly
On 2015-03-26 at 11:52, e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
> The graphviz tools are fantastic for quick and dirty graphs but the
> layout algorithms are not easily controlled... I would highly
> recommend tikz ...
Or perhaps ditaa.
-k.
On Thursday, 26 Mar 2015 at 13:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I was asked to make a diagram and was thinking that dot in org-mode could
> be a good idea.
[...]
> This is a good deal in the right direction, but a few things should be
> different:
The graphviz tools are fantastic for quick and dirty
I was asked to make a diagram and was thinking that dot in org-mode could
be a good idea.
I got reasonably fast the following:
#+BEGIN_SRC dot :file test.svg :cmdline -Kdot -Tsvg
graph {
utilities [label = "Utility's"]
A
B
C
D
E
F [shape = recta
14 matches
Mail list logo
