On 16.1.2012, at 17:31, Max Mikhanosha wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
>
> At Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:40:01 +0100,
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> On 16.1.2012, at 13:18, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I am talking about `org-agenda-markers', and indeed, some
>> care has to be taken here. Basically, the fun
Hi Carsten,
At Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:40:01 +0100,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On 16.1.2012, at 13:18, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> Sorry, I am talking about `org-agenda-markers', and indeed, some
> care has to be taken here. Basically, the function
> org-agenda-new-marker needs to be modified to take a
On 16.1.2012, at 13:18, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi Max,
>
> this is a pretty good solution if the main issue with slow agenda
> is that it feels slow because you are often switching back and forth
> between different agenda buffers. I like it, and I would vote for
> integration into Org-mode,
Hi Max,
this is a pretty good solution if the main issue with slow agenda
is that it feels slow because you are often switching back and forth
between different agenda buffers. I like it, and I would vote for
integration into Org-mode, not as a separate package, but directly,
as an option. If Ba
As my agenda files slowly grew over the years, the speed of generating
agenda had slowly deteriorated, finally hitting the point of me jdoing
something about it. (it got to around 5-7 seconds, which kind of
interrupts work-flow)
Attached file org-agenda-cache.el is a "quick fix" solution that I
de
