Hello,
Pavel Panchekha writes:
> I have
>
> #+TITLE: title here
>>
>
> #+DATE: <2016-10-20>
>>
>
> in an org file, with no other "#+" lines set.
>
> In my configuration file, I have set
>
> (setf org-html-postamble-format
>> (list
>>(list
>> "en"
>> "By %a on
>> %d
I'm sorry, let me give a full bug report:
I have
#+TITLE: title here
>
#+DATE: <2016-10-20>
>
in an org file, with no other "#+" lines set.
In my configuration file, I have set
(setf org-html-postamble-format
> (list
>(list
> "en"
> "By %a on
> %d.\n")))
>
(setf
Hello,
Pavel Panchekha writes:
> I've been trying to set the date format in the HTML postamble. It looks
> like a date given in #+DATE is not being formatted according to the date
> format specification, but if no #+DATE is given, the format specification
> is used.
>
> Is this intended behavior
I've been trying to set the date format in the HTML postamble. It looks
like a date given in #+DATE is not being formatted according to the date
format specification, but if no #+DATE is given, the format specification
is used.
Is this intended behavior—should I write formatted dates in #+DATE?
—
