On Apr 20, 2012, at 6:35 PM, Bastien wrote:
> Don't underestimate the Unpredictable -- I'm sure if you write something
> with overlays and funny Unicode chars for list bullets people will start
> using it. Speaking for me, I'd be curious to test it!
Speaking of unpredictable; Emacs 24 now supp
Hi Mark,
"Mark E. Shoulson" writes:
> I'd
> offer to write a patch for some of the more obvious ones, to free up that
> much time from others, but it would be so small, it would probably take as
> long for someone to look over my patch as to write it themselves, so it
> wouldn't save anyone any
On 04/20/2012 09:38 AM, Bastien wrote:
Hi Mark,
I agree with Nicolas that a solution based on overlays would be better.
Probably, though very possibly not worth it.
I also agree with you that there are many areas where we let the users
modify the content of Org files in a way that makes the
On Apr 20, 2012, at 6:19 AM, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
> I guess. I spoke with someone on the IRC channel about this too, the basic
> idea being that the Org format should be stable, so the same file won't parse
> or behave differently on different installations. There's something to be
> said
Hi Mark,
I agree with Nicolas that a solution based on overlays would be better.
I also agree with you that there are many areas where we let the users
modify the content of Org files in a way that makes them unparsable in
a systematic manner.
This is always a trade-off: user flexibility vs a r
"Mark E. Shoulson" writes:
> else reconsider my patch
Contributions to Org/Emacs requires copyright assignments. Search for
FSF in the following page: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html
I am wondering:
Why a overlay solution will not work for you? Why do you need Unicode
characters
I guess. I spoke with someone on the IRC channel about this too, the
basic idea being that the Org format should be stable, so the same file
won't parse or behave differently on different installations. There's
something to be said for that, but there are a fair number of
customizable options
On Apr 19, 2012, at 11:40 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:18, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> "Mark E. Shoulson" writes:
>>
>>> Attached is a patch that adds a customization variable for setting
>>> which characters you can use as bullets in plain lists. Unicode has
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:18, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> "Mark E. Shoulson" writes:
>
>> Attached is a patch that adds a customization variable for setting
>> which characters you can use as bullets in plain lists. Unicode has
>> all kinds of pretty characters like ❧ or ☞ that would be
Hello,
"Mark E. Shoulson" writes:
> Attached is a patch that adds a customization variable for setting
> which characters you can use as bullets in plain lists. Unicode has
> all kinds of pretty characters like ❧ or ☞ that would be good for
> bullets, why limit ourselves to just [-+*]?
This ha
Attached is a patch that adds a customization variable for
setting which characters you can use as bullets in plain lists.
Unicode has all kinds of pretty characters like ❧ or ☞ that would
be good for bullets, why limit ourselves to just [-+*]?
The variable's "set"
11 matches
Mail list logo
