Hi Bastien,
On 3/24/13, Bastien wrote:
>> So in Firefox for me at least, there is no blank line between
>> Footnotes: and 1.
>
> "Footnotes:" is inserted as a header in the HTML file.
>
> So there should be a visual space after it.
I don't know why there isn't. I guess it means CSS is required
Samuel Wales writes:
> So in Firefox for me at least, there is no blank line between
> Footnotes: and 1.
"Footnotes:" is inserted as a header in the HTML file.
So there should be a visual space after it.
--
Bastien
On 3/24/13, Bastien wrote:
> It is for me. Screenshots help a lot with those issues,
> especially when they are often not bugs, but small quirks
> wrt personal preferences. Thanks for sending screenshots
> if you can.
Screenshot is not feasible ATM. However, the example I showed was a
copy pas
Samuel Wales writes:
> I expected text after "Footnotes" (hmm, I should remove the colon if
> possible) to be like text after any other section.
It is for me. Screenshots help a lot with those issues,
especially when they are often not bugs, but small quirks
wrt personal preferences. Thanks fo
On 3/19/13, Bastien wrote:
>> It might be good to add a blank line after the Footnotes section.
>
> The default is fine IMHO.
>
> You'd need to define the #footnotes css id for this.
I'm not familiar with CSS enough to know here. It wouldn't come for
free with the header code? Here is what it l
Hi Samuel,
Samuel Wales writes:
> It might be good to add a blank line after the Footnotes section.
The default is fine IMHO.
You'd need to define the #footnotes css id for this.
HTH,
--
Bastien
Hi Bastien,
On 3/12/13, Bastien wrote:
> Samuel Wales writes:
>> For some reason, I am getting no blank lines between footnotes, and no
>> blank lines between paragraphs in multi-paragraph footnotes. Any idea
>> why? Tested in Firefox.
>
> This should now be fixed, thanks!
I have tested this
Hi Samuel,
Samuel Wales writes:
> For some reason, I am getting no blank lines between footnotes, and no
> blank lines between paragraphs in multi-paragraph footnotes. Any idea
> why? Tested in Firefox.
This should now be fixed, thanks!
--
Bastien
Hi Bastien,
Thanks for removing the table tags. It looks great in w3m. Much less
confusing.
For some reason, I am getting no blank lines between footnotes, and no
blank lines between paragraphs in multi-paragraph footnotes. Any idea
why? Tested in Firefox.
I can try to dig up old exporter ou
Aloha Jambunathan,
Jambunathan K writes:
> Thomas
>
> I will reply to you in private.
>
> I am talking to Samuels and Ricks who think that I have no right to
> offer my opinions on what gets in to that file.
If this is indeed what is being discussed, then there is no reason to
discuss it on the
Jambunathan K writes:
> I wrote the code, I know where it will bite. I will not say it, because
> you seem so confident. Yes, go ahead and fix it.
Done, thanks.
--
Bastien
Bastien writes:
> Jambunathan K writes:
>
>> I was typing faster. So I consider what I typed grammatically
>> malformed. Sorry.
>
> No problem.
>
>> People who want improvements to ox-html.el should be willing to work
>> with me or act on my comments or argue with me or openly call me I am
>>
Thomas
I will reply to you in private.
I am talking to Samuels and Ricks who think that I have no right to
offer my opinions on what gets in to that file.
Jambunathan K.
Jambunathan K writes:
> I was typing faster. So I consider what I typed grammatically
> malformed. Sorry.
No problem.
> People who want improvements to ox-html.el should be willing to work
> with me or act on my comments or argue with me or openly call me I am
> wrong.
People who want to wor
Bastien writes:
> Jambunathan K writes:
>
>> I asked him to remove ox-html.el and he indicated how he wanted to
>> proceed ahead. He wants ox-html.el in the tree and not GNU ELPA.
>
> Just to prevent confusion: I never said anything like this.
>
> ox-html.el is in the master branch of Org's rep
Jambunathan K writes:
> Samuel Wales writes:
>
>> On 3/9/13, Jambunathan K wrote:
>>> I am sure Samuel will remind us infinitely if we forget about it.
>>
>>> Unless you say why it is confusing, I would count the above statement as
>>> just mis-information and not a fact that other parties coul
Jambunathan K writes:
> I asked him to remove ox-html.el and he indicated how he wanted to
> proceed ahead. He wants ox-html.el in the tree and not GNU ELPA.
Just to prevent confusion: I never said anything like this.
ox-html.el is in the master branch of Org's repository, it will be
in GNU EL
Samuel Wales writes:
> On 3/9/13, Jambunathan K wrote:
>> I am sure Samuel will remind us infinitely if we forget about it.
>
>> Unless you say why it is confusing, I would count the above statement as
>> just mis-information and not a fact that other parties could agree with.
>
> You promised t
On 3/9/13, Jambunathan K wrote:
> I am sure Samuel will remind us infinitely if we forget about it.
> Unless you say why it is confusing, I would count the above statement as
> just mis-information and not a fact that other parties could agree with.
You promised to leave:
On 2/12/13, Jambunatha
Jambunathan K writes:
>> They output a table, which looks IMO very confusing in both w3m and
>> Firefox. The old exporter worked fine. The solution IMO is to remove
>> the table tags.
I don't think footnotes export are confusing. I have seen people using
it and not complain about it.
Unless
Samuel Wales writes:
> On 2/27/13, Samuel Wales wrote:
>> On 2/13/13, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>>> Anyway, if you send the correct HTML that should be generated, I will
>>> fix it.
>>
>> Probably all that needs to be done is to not use a table. I tested this by
>> manually removingand their
On 2/27/13, Samuel Wales wrote:
> On 2/13/13, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> Anyway, if you send the correct HTML that should be generated, I will
>> fix it.
>
> Probably all that needs to be done is to not use a table. I tested this by
> manually removingand their closing tags.
I am referring t
22 matches
Mail list logo
