Hi Francois,
On 1/24/13, François Pinard wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand the use case
Your Org in elisp solution allows limited Org functionality in Elisp
and other files. You cannot put those files in the agenda, or do many
other things that you can do with agenda files. The entries are no
Samuel Wales writes:
> What if we could have bidirectional links, and actually use an agenda
> file for some of the entries instead of keeping the entries in the
> non-Org file?
I'm not sure I understand the use case you have in head. Maybe
executable links could be helpful to you? I use them
I like the idea a lot. Thanks for posting it. It will help with
lists in elisp files.
Also wondering about the opposite. What if we could have
bidirectional links, and actually use an agenda file for some of the
entries instead of keeping the entries in the non-Org file?
Samuel
--
The Kafka
Hi François,
François Pinard writes:
>https://github.com/pinard/PopOrg
I added a link to
https://github.com/pinard/PopOrg/blob/master/poporg.el
In worg/org-hacks.org:
http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/worg.git/commit/?id=c0a908
Please edit this further to refine it!
Thanks,
--
Bastien
Hi, Org people.
It is often suggested that literate Org programming means interspersing
program fragments within an Org file. For practical reasons, I rather
prefer adding Org documentation into my programs. So this helping tool
which pops out a temporary Org mode buffer with the contents of the
