Thanks for the feedback. Here is a second round of revised commits. I
addressed the comments you made. I have not pushed these to the branch
yet. Let me know what you think about these. Thanks for the help!
commit f5bcdaac6e3d4507c934b8872c4a53c4d90e9143
Author: John Kitchin
Date: Tue Jul 5 10
John Kitchin writes:
> I pasted the diffs at the end. There are a lot because it touched a lot of
> files, and I committed each one separately, and forgot a few commits
> that ended up as extras. Probably some could be combined and squashed if
> that is desirable. I am not sure how to do it yet t
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> John Kitchin writes:
>
>> I have completed a draft of links-9.0
>> (https://github.com/jkitchin/org-mode/tree/link-9.0). This centralizes
>> almost all link properties into a variable `org-link-parameters' and
>> makes it possible to customize almost everythi
Completing myself,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> It is better to create a new function, e.g., `org-link-add' with the
> following signature
>
> (defun org-link-add (type &rest properties)
>...)
>
> used like
>
> (org-link-add "red" :follow (lambda (path desc backend) ...) :export )
Basi
Hello,
John Kitchin writes:
> I have completed a draft of links-9.0
> (https://github.com/jkitchin/org-mode/tree/link-9.0). This centralizes
> almost all link properties into a variable `org-link-parameters' and
> makes it possible to customize almost everything in the link.
Thank you.
> which
Hi all,
I have completed a draft of links-9.0
(https://github.com/jkitchin/org-mode/tree/link-9.0). This centralizes
almost all link properties into a variable `org-link-parameters' and
makes it possible to customize almost everything in the link.
This branch passes all the tests except these: 2
