Hello,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> As I was offline for a few days, I toyed a bit with this. I wrote the
> following library.
Awesome, thanks for your work!
> I didn't test it thoroughly. I didn't write regression tests
> either.
>
> Also, it ignores UNNUMBERED property and export tags. I have t
NICOLAS> As I was offline for a few days, I toyed a bit with this. I
NICOLAS> wrote the following library. I didn't test it thoroughly. I
NICOLAS> didn't write regression tests either.
ERIC> Although I probably won't use this often, I have tried it out
ERIC> and it seems to w
On Thursday, 1 Nov 2018 at 18:49, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> As I was offline for a few days, I toyed a bit with this. I wrote the
> following library. I didn't test it thoroughly. I didn't write
> regression tests either.
Although I probably won't use this often, I have tried it out and it
seems t
Hello,
"Garreau, Alexandre" writes:
> No it doesn’t update anything, and doesn’t color number compatibly with
> outlining. Also it’s not integrated in org and only available in melpa,
> unsigned.
As I was offline for a few days, I toyed a bit with this. I wrote the
following library. I didn't
On 2018/10/25 at 17:02, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> "Garreau, Alexandre" writes:
>> Le 24/10/2018 à 13h40, Nicolas Goaziou a écrit :
>>> But you don't need to number the whole buffer, do you?
>>
>> At least the screen.
>>
>>> A breadcrumb like feature could be enough. E.g., you hit at the
>>> beginn
Hello,
"Garreau, Alexandre" writes:
> Le 24/10/2018 à 13h40, Nicolas Goaziou a écrit :
>> But you don't need to number the whole buffer, do you?
>
> At least the screen.
>
>> A breadcrumb like feature could be enough. E.g., you hit at the
>> beginning of a headline and get the numbering in addi
Le 24/10/2018 à 13h40, Nicolas Goaziou a écrit :
> "Garreau, Alexandre" writes:
>
>> As said in the previously mentioned stackoverflow question: helps
>> seeing where you are and how much sections are there. To me it is
>> especially useful to avoid writing manually the number of the section to
>
"Garreau, Alexandre" writes:
> As said in the previously mentioned stackoverflow question: helps
> seeing where you are and how much sections are there. To me it is
> especially useful to avoid writing manually the number of the section to
> know I’m currently in “exercice 8” or something alike.
Le 24/10/2018 à 09h38, Nicolas Goaziou a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> "Garreau, Alexandre" writes:
>
>> But that doesn’t answer the question: why “doesn’t it exist”? shouldn’t
>> these functions be mainlined, if legally permitted?
>
> What kind of numbering are we talking about? A semi-permanent (i.e.,
>
Hello,
"Garreau, Alexandre" writes:
> But that doesn’t answer the question: why “doesn’t it exist”? shouldn’t
> these functions be mainlined, if legally permitted?
What kind of numbering are we talking about? A semi-permanent (i.e.,
togglable) naive numbering (e.g., not taking into account UNNU
On 2018-10-23 at 14:33, John Kitchin wrote:
> There are some answers at
> https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/32396/complete-path-numbering-of-org-mode-headlines-and-plain-lists
Interesting. Thank you (I’m unfortunately not very friend with search
engines): that also raises altogether the q
There are some answers at
https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/32396/complete-path-numbering-of-org-mode-headlines-and-plain-lists
.
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA
Hi,
This is provided on (almost?) all export formats, but yet when looking
at an org-file the prefered way, with emacs, there’s no numbering, by
default.
It’s so useful and simple (using a display text/overlay property), is
there just anything implementing that? mainline? if so why isn’t it?
13 matches
Mail list logo
