Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>>> So I suppose the maximum digest size is already configurable without
>>> logging an issue with the mailman devs.
>>
>> Okay, I'll check this with the emacs-orgmode@ admins.
>
> This is the variable digest_size_threshold (also editable from the web
> inter
Bastien writes:
>> So I suppose the maximum digest size is already configurable without
>> logging an issue with the mailman devs.
>
> Okay, I'll check this with the emacs-orgmode@ admins.
This is the variable digest_size_threshold (also editable from the web
interface), it sets how many kiB a dig
Hi James,
James Harkins writes:
> So I suppose the maximum digest size is already configurable without
> logging an issue with the mailman devs.
Okay, I'll check this with the emacs-orgmode@ admins.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
On Sep 18, 2012 6:26 PM, "Bastien" wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> James Harkins writes:
>
> > There must be a smarter way to group messages into digests so that no
> > single digest is too big, while messages don't get lost.
>
> I assume this is about mailman digests.
>
> If so, please report this to t
Hi James,
James Harkins writes:
> There must be a smarter way to group messages into digests so that no
> single digest is too big, while messages don't get lost.
I assume this is about mailman digests.
If so, please report this to the mailman developers.
We don't have any way to fix this fro
If there is a very long message, the digest gets truncated. For instance,
in digest volume 79, issue 14, the fourth message consists of an immense
stack trace. The digest cuts off midway through. According to the table of
contents, that leaves 39 messages that I can't read without clicking around
i
