Am 30.08.2012 13:25, schrieb Bastien:
> Rainer Stengele writes:
>
>> The name of the agenda buffer now is correct, but the contents is not.
>>
>> Being in "Org Agenda(01)" and moving to yesterday and back again to
>> today with "b" and "f" I get the correct results of my custom agenda
>> function
Rainer Stengele writes:
> The name of the agenda buffer now is correct, but the contents is not.
>
> Being in "Org Agenda(01)" and moving to yesterday and back again to
> today with "b" and "f" I get the correct results of my custom agenda
> function.
> Jumping to yesterday and back to today with
Am 30.08.2012 11:52, schrieb Bastien:
> Rainer Stengele writes:
>
>> Sorry but - no.
>> Agenda now changes to "*Org Agenda*", does not stay with the chosen
>> sticky one.
>
> Well, should be now. Thanks!
>
The name of the agenda buffer now is correct, but the contents is not.
Being in "Org A
Rainer Stengele writes:
> Sorry but - no.
> Agenda now changes to "*Org Agenda*", does not stay with the chosen
> sticky one.
Well, should be now. Thanks!
--
Bastien
Am 30.08.2012 10:58, schrieb Bastien:
> Rainer Stengele writes:
>
>> Now - being in a sticky agenda and jumping to another date via "j" the
>> agenda command called is not the one I was in.
>> Example:
>>
>> I am in "Org Agenda(01)", jump to yesterday and get "Org Agenda(a)",
>> which of course i
Rainer Stengele writes:
> Now - being in a sticky agenda and jumping to another date via "j" the
> agenda command called is not the one I was in.
> Example:
>
> I am in "Org Agenda(01)", jump to yesterday and get "Org Agenda(a)",
> which of course is not what I want.
>
> This looks like a bug.
I
Am 30.08.2012 07:42, schrieb Bastien:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>
>> I don't know if
>> something would preclude the declaration be changed to e definition with
>> nil as a value, but I think Bastien would know.
>
> I don't have any steady theory about this, but as a convention I try to
> (defvar [v
Nick Dokos wrote:
> shows it clearly - 50/50 hindsight is such a blessing - but I didn't
optometrically suspect: 20/20 hindsight is perhaps preferable...
Achim Gratz writes:
> I don't know if
> something would preclude the declaration be changed to e definition with
> nil as a value, but I think Bastien would know.
I don't have any steady theory about this, but as a convention I try to
(defvar [var] nil) for dynamically bound vars in the current
Rainer Stengele wrote:
> I use sticky Agenda since some months.
> Doing a "org-toggle-sticky-agenda" and calling any agenda function makes the
> error disappear!
>
OK - that clarifies things: I don't use sticky agenda, so that explains
why I didn't get the error. Looking at the backtrace a bi
Am 29.08.2012 20:30, schrieb Achim Gratz:
> Nick Dokos writes:
>> There was a backtrace in Rainer's original message complaining about
>> org-keys not being defined. If I had to guess, I'd say it looks like a
>> frankenstein build to me, but I'm really not sure.
>
> Yes, but he's since re-made the
Nick Dokos writes:
> There was a backtrace in Rainer's original message complaining about
> org-keys not being defined. If I had to guess, I'd say it looks like a
> frankenstein build to me, but I'm really not sure.
Yes, but he's since re-made the autoloads file at least and the new
backtrace migh
Achim Gratz wrote:
> Rainer Stengele writes:
> > No, that didn't help.
> > I have the same error on my machine at home after upgrading (Windows XP).
>
> Well, then do M-x toggle-debug-on-error before going to the agenda and
> post the backtrace.
>
There was a backtrace in Rainer's original mes
Rainer Stengele writes:
> No, that didn't help.
> I have the same error on my machine at home after upgrading (Windows XP).
Well, then do M-x toggle-debug-on-error before going to the agenda and
post the backtrace.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blo
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Stengele writes:
> I have the same error on my machine at home after upgrading (Windows
> XP).
Try recompiling with `make' then M-x org-reload RET
--
Bastien
Am 29.08.2012 18:21, schrieb Nick Dokos:
> Rainer Stengele wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> having upgraded to
>>
>> Org-mode version 7.9 (release_7.9-132-g31268a @
>> c:/Users/rainer/AppData/Roaming/.emacs.d/org/lisp/)
>>
>> being in agenda I want to jump to another date with "j".
>> Choosing the date and
Rainer Stengele wrote:
> Hi,
>
> having upgraded to
>
> Org-mode version 7.9 (release_7.9-132-g31268a @
> c:/Users/rainer/AppData/Roaming/.emacs.d/org/lisp/)
>
> being in agenda I want to jump to another date with "j".
> Choosing the date and pressing enter gives me this:
>
>
> Debugger ente
Hi,
having upgraded to
Org-mode version 7.9 (release_7.9-132-g31268a @
c:/Users/rainer/AppData/Roaming/.emacs.d/org/lisp/)
being in agenda I want to jump to another date with "j".
Choosing the date and pressing enter gives me this:
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable org-keys)
(and
18 matches
Mail list logo
