On 2015-01-01, at 17:22, Karl Voit wrote:
> * Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>>
>> On 2014-12-31, at 14:49, Ista Zahn wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, google is very convenient.
>>
>> That's why they're so dangerous.
>
> In case you're survey data contains privacy-related sensible data,
> you can not use Google an
* Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>
> On 2014-12-31, at 14:49, Ista Zahn wrote:
>
>> Yes, google is very convenient.
>
> That's why they're so dangerous.
In case you're survey data contains privacy-related sensible data,
you can not use Google anyhow - I do think that there's no need to
mention this exp
On 2014-12-31, at 14:49, Ista Zahn wrote:
> Yes, google is very convenient.
That's why they're so dangerous.
Regards,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Karl Voit wrote:
> * Ista Zahn wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 31, 2014 5:38 AM, "Karl Voit" wrote:
>>>
>>> When I was a researcher, I used SurveyMonkey for my surveys. It's
>>> open source and web-based. You get the data in CSV files AFAIR.
>>
>> No, I don't believe surveym
* Ista Zahn wrote:
>
> On Dec 31, 2014 5:38 AM, "Karl Voit" wrote:
>>
>> When I was a researcher, I used SurveyMonkey for my surveys. It's
>> open source and web-based. You get the data in CSV files AFAIR.
>
> No, I don't believe surveymonkey is open source. Perhaps you are thinking
> of limesurv
On Dec 31, 2014 5:38 AM, "Karl Voit" wrote:
>
> * Vikas Rawal wrote:
> >
> > But there would be many interesting things one could do in an
> > emacs/org-based solution. My biggest worry is that it would
> > require continuous training of people coming in to enter data.
>
> I think you can differ
* Vikas Rawal wrote:
>
> But there would be many interesting things one could do in an
> emacs/org-based solution. My biggest worry is that it would
> require continuous training of people coming in to enter data.
I think you can differ between the data entry platform and the
platform where you
