Thomas S. Dye writes:
AFAIK, the only software that has proposed a solution to the
problem of maintaining a citation database that can support the
universe of citation styles developed "in the wild" is BibLaTeX.
Well with BibTeX alone you can maintain a citation database and to
support any
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
> On Tuesday 24 February 2015 11:37 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>> Aloha Vaidheeswaran C,
>>
>> Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>>
>>> On Tuesday 24 February 2015 10:31 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
> Often times there is a difference between what
On Tuesday 24 February 2015 11:37 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Aloha Vaidheeswaran C,
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
On Tuesday 24 February 2015 10:31 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
Often times there is a difference between what is possible and what is
the common practice. So,
1
Aloha Vaidheeswaran C,
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
> On Tuesday 24 February 2015 10:31 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>> Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>>
>>> Often times there is a difference between what is possible and what is
>>> the common practice. So,
>>>
>>> 1. How often do you intermix in-text and par
On Tuesday 24 February 2015 10:31 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
Often times there is a difference between what is possible and what is
the common practice. So,
1. How often do you intermix in-text and parenthetical styles.
Every day?
Ok.
2. Can the document author re
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
> Often times there is a difference between what is possible and what is
> the common practice. So,
>
> 1. How often do you intermix in-text and parenthetical styles.
Every day?
> 2. Can the document author re-word his work in such a way that an
>in-text or parenthe
On Tuesday 24 February 2015 04:55 AM, Richard Lawrence wrote:
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
But whatever style is chosen, I would still think that the fact that the
citation is in-text rather than parenthetical, and that it has a prefix
and suffix, should be represented in the output.
1. When you
On Tuesday 24 February 2015 08:56 AM, Alexis wrote:
For examle, one might have a citation style like:
[Smith 2001]
which in certain contexts is expected to have a presentation style of
'bolded'.
So what i understand Vaidheeswaran to be asking is: Please don't code
things such that presentation
On 2015-02-24T10:25:39+1100, Richard Lawrence said:
RL> Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>>> But whatever style is chosen, I would still think that the
>>> fact that the citation is in-text rather than parenthetical,
>>> and that it has a prefix and suffix, should be represented in
>>> the output.
>
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>> But whatever style is chosen, I would still think that the fact that the
>> citation is in-text rather than parenthetical, and that it has a prefix
>> and suffix, should be represented in the output.
>
> 1. When you choose 'style' (Chicago etc.) wouldn't be one of in-te
Vaidheeswaran writes:
>> We haven't really discussed how styles should be specified (yet), or the
>> formatting of bibliographies. But we have been discussing a syntax that
>> lets you specify those formatting properties which commonly differ
>> between individual citations.
>
> IMO, it is bette
More importantly I see Nicolas willing to make the
necessary modifications to export engine.
Let us JUST ACCEPT what Nicolas is saying and work from there.
Otherwise, the current momentum will peter out (much like earlier
initiatives).
For now, if each of us could just step back a little and
On Monday 23 February 2015 09:41 AM, Richard Lawrence wrote:
Hi Vaidheeswaran,
Thanks for your input about citations!
Vaidheeswaran writes:
Those working on the citation syntax should make it clear that the
"lowest common" cite syntax does NOT also IMPOSE (or GUARANTEE) a
specific style on
Hi Vaidheeswaran,
Thanks for your input about citations!
Vaidheeswaran writes:
> Those working on the citation syntax should make it clear that the
> "lowest common" cite syntax does NOT also IMPOSE (or GUARANTEE) a
> specific style on the produced document.
>
> When I say this, I specifically
Those working on the citation syntax should make it clear that the
"lowest common" cite syntax does NOT also IMPOSE (or GUARANTEE) a
specific style on the produced document.
When I say this, I specifically mean:
1. I want my citation and references to be carried over FAITHFULLY to
the export
15 matches
Mail list logo
