Re: [O] Bug in publishing to LaTeX

2012-12-20 Thread Bastien
Achim Gratz writes: > Still, reverting 7a9d3457073 should solve that problem. The alternative > would be to remove that argument in all other org-export-as- > functions. PS: that's what I did, except for the DocBook exporter, which I will certainly move to contrib/ for 8.0 anyway. -- Bastien

Re: [O] Bug in publishing to LaTeX

2012-12-20 Thread Bastien
Hi all, Giovanni Ridolfi writes: > thanks for catching, however > > org-export-as-latex is an interactive autoloaded Lisp function in > `org-latex.el'. > > This export engine will be dropped and replaced by the new exporter, > so I don't think it will be fixed. I fixed this -- we still don't kn

Re: [O] Bug in publishing to LaTeX

2012-11-20 Thread Achim Gratz
Giovanni Ridolfi writes: > org-export-as-latex is an interactive autoloaded Lisp function in > `org-latex.el'. > > This export engine will be dropped and replaced by the new exporter, > so I don't think it will be fixed. Still, reverting 7a9d3457073 should solve that problem. The alternative woul

Re: [O] Bug in publishing to LaTeX

2012-11-20 Thread Giovanni Ridolfi
Da: Harri Kiiskinen Inviato: Lunedì 19 Novembre 2012 20:45 Hi, Harri, > it seems that there is a bug in publishing to LaTeX: > org-publish-org-to calls org-export-as -functions with six arguments: > but org-export-as-latex accepts only five: thanks for catching, however org-export-as-latex is

[O] Bug in publishing to LaTeX

2012-11-19 Thread Harri Kiiskinen
Hi, it seems that there is a bug in publishing to LaTeX: org-publish-org-to calls org-export-as -functions with six arguments: (funcall (intern (concat "org-export-as-" format)) (plist-get plist :headline-levels) nil plist nil