Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

2017-01-18 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Kyle Meyer writes: > Yes, c31462f33 resolved the issue. That commit also introduced a > regression: a blank string passed as the SHIFT argument causes an error. > I've followed up with 1fbc7a424 to restore the previous behavior. Indeed. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

2017-01-17 Thread Kyle Meyer
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Karl Voit writes: [...] >> You're right, I can confirm your issue. I get "Before first headline >> at position 1 in buffer *temp*" as well. > > Fixed (hopefully) this time. Yes, c31462f33 resolved the issue. That commit also introduced a regression: a blank string

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

2017-01-17 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Karl Voit writes: > * Kyle Meyer wrote: >> >> Thanks. The additional check looks good, as it replaces an error with a >> more appropriate user-error and gives an error message that is a bit >> more specific. >> >> However, the re-positioning of the org-back-to-heading call seems >> prob

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

2017-01-16 Thread Karl Voit
* Kyle Meyer wrote: > > Thanks. The additional check looks good, as it replaces an error with a > more appropriate user-error and gives an error message that is a bit > more specific. > > However, the re-positioning of the org-back-to-heading call seems > problematic because the call is now wrapp

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

2017-01-16 Thread Kyle Meyer
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Thank you. I applied your patch with an additional check. Thanks. The additional check looks good, as it replaces an error with a more appropriate user-error and gives an error message that is a bit more specific. However, the re-positioning of the org-back-to-heading

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift (FIXED)

2017-01-16 Thread Karl Voit
Hello, * Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Kyle Meyer writes: > >> Subject: [PATCH] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift: Fix timestamp search > > Thank you. I applied your patch with an additional check. I pulled the fix from "maint" and I re-tested my test cases: issue is fixed at my side. Thanks Kyle

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

2017-01-16 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Kyle Meyer writes: > Subject: [PATCH] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift: Fix timestamp search > > * lisp/org.el (org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift): Move to the > beginning of the heading before the timestamp search so that the > user will be prompted for a time shift even if point is

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

2017-01-16 Thread Kyle Meyer
Karl Voit writes: > Hi! > > I wrote a blog article on how I am using Org with recurring events > or tasks: > http://karl-voit.at/2017/01/15/org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift/ > > As Michael Maurer stated in a comment below, > org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift does not ask for time-shift > dependi

Re: [O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

2017-01-16 Thread Karl Voit
* Karl Voit wrote: > > As Michael Maurer stated in a comment below, > org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift does not ask for time-shift > depending on the location of the cursor. He is using Org-mode version 8.2.10. -- get mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML into Org-mode:

[O] Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift not asking for time-shift

2017-01-16 Thread Karl Voit
Hi! I wrote a blog article on how I am using Org with recurring events or tasks: http://karl-voit.at/2017/01/15/org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift/ As Michael Maurer stated in a comment below, org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift does not ask for time-shift depending on the location of the cursor. I