Hello,
Daniele Pizzolli writes:
> yes, the problem is fixed both for dates and footnotes in sections, and
> should be fixed for any of: bold footnote-reference italic strike-through
> timestamp underline if I understand it correctly. Nice! I hope you plan
> to merge it.
Done.
Regards,
--
Ni
On 10/03/2013 03:30 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
The following patch should protect some fragile commands in
a section-like structure. It is Beamer-only since general LaTeX back-end
doesn't seem to encounter these problems.
Does it fix the problem?
Hello Nicolas,
yes, the problem is fixed both
Hello,
Daniele Pizzolli writes:
> On 10/02/2013 05:55 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> Daniele Pizzolli writes:
>>
>>> Yes, I think is fair to drop the markup.
>>
>> OK.
>>
>>> I would also think that this is safe default when nested markup is
>>> bad.
The following patch should protect some fragi
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 05:55:44PM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Daniele Pizzolli writes:
>
> > Yes, I think is fair to drop the markup.
>
> OK.
>
> > I would also think that this is safe default when nested markup is
> > bad.
>
> Do you have an exhaustive list of such cases?
>
> > Maybe th
Dnia 2013-10-02, o godz. 18:10:57
Daniele Pizzolli napisał(a):
> > Of course, that's a similar problem: footnotes are not allowed in
> > headlines. Though, in this case, it isn't possible to drop the
> > markup. What LaTeX code do you suggest?
>
> Mmm, I think you are asking to the wrong person.
On 10/02/2013 05:55 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Daniele Pizzolli writes:
Yes, I think is fair to drop the markup.
OK.
I would also think that this is safe default when nested markup is
bad.
Do you have an exhaustive list of such cases?
No, not really but I try to report them as soon I fo
Daniele Pizzolli writes:
> Yes, I think is fair to drop the markup.
OK.
> I would also think that this is safe default when nested markup is
> bad.
Do you have an exhaustive list of such cases?
> Maybe the exporter can emit a notice/warning.
That it dropped the markup?
> Yes, sorry, I mixed
On 10/02/2013 03:45 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
Daniele Pizzolli writes:
In fact I use org-mode primarily to stay away from *tex
nuisances... and I think that I am not the only one. I know enough
latex to find a workaround myself (not enough to offer a general
reliable solution) but I d
Hello,
Daniele Pizzolli writes:
> In fact I use org-mode primarily to stay away from *tex
> nuisances... and I think that I am not the only one. I know enough
> latex to find a workaround myself (not enough to offer a general
> reliable solution) but I do not think that this will be a pleasant
On 09/30/2013 06:02 PM, Daniele Pizzolli wrote:
But org-mode allow this!
I think that if something is allowed in org-mode syntax but not by the
underlining tools used for export, the exporter should take care to find
a suitable workaround.
Hello all,
I see all your interesting points on the
Dnia 2013-10-01, o godz. 18:01:51
Nicolas Goaziou napisał(a):
> > Sounds good for me. (NB: there's a similar problems with tags,
> > AFAIR. And (AFAIR!) it's even worse, since the exporter uses a
> > low-level TeX command \hfill.)
>
> Well, there is `org-latex-active-timestamp-format',
> `org-l
Hello,
Marcin Borkowski writes:
> Daniele Pizzolli napisał(a):
>> Or why not drop \textit?
>
> Sounds good for me. (NB: there's a similar problems with tags, AFAIR.
> And (AFAIR!) it's even worse, since the exporter uses a low-level TeX
> command \hfill.)
Well, there is `org-latex-active-time
Daniele Pizzolli writes:
[...]
> I think that if something is allowed in org-mode syntax but not by the
> underlining tools used for export, the exporter should take care to find
> a suitable workaround.
I think this is rather ambitious and would make life very difficult for
exporter maintainer
Dnia 2013-09-30, o godz. 18:02:51
Daniele Pizzolli napisał(a):
> >> It's a LaTeX Beamer problem: it doesn't like
> >>
> >>\section{title \textit{[2013-09-29 Sun]}}
> >>
> >> produced by Org, although regular LaTeX accepts it.
> >>
> >> Do you know about a workaround for this?
>
> Not really.
On 09/29/2013 05:27 PM, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Dnia 2013-09-29, o godz. 16:53:14
Nicolas Goaziou:
[]
It's a LaTeX Beamer problem: it doesn't like
\section{title \textit{[2013-09-29 Sun]}}
produced by Org, although regular LaTeX accepts it.
Do you know about a workaround for this?
Not
Dnia 2013-09-29, o godz. 16:53:14
Nicolas Goaziou napisał(a):
> Hello,
>
> Daniele Pizzolli writes:
>
> > Dates in org-format in heading break the beamer export:
> >
> > Minimal case:
> >
> > #+OPTIONS: H:3
> > * title [2013-09-29 Sun]
> > ** section
> > *** frame
> > text
> >
> > Result for b
Hello,
Daniele Pizzolli writes:
> Dates in org-format in heading break the beamer export:
>
> Minimal case:
>
> #+OPTIONS: H:3
> * title [2013-09-29 Sun]
> ** section
> *** frame
> text
>
> Result for beamer export:
>
> org-latex-compile: PDF file ./beamer-bug-date.pdf wasn't produced:
> [undefi
Hello @all,
Dates in org-format in heading break the beamer export:
Minimal case:
#+OPTIONS: H:3
* title [2013-09-29 Sun]
** section
*** frame
text
Result for beamer export:
org-latex-compile: PDF file ./beamer-bug-date.pdf wasn't produced: [undefined
control sequence] Runaway argument
The
18 matches
Mail list logo
