Hi Torsten,
Torsten Bronger writes:
> Possibly. On the other hand, both "longlines" and "auto-fill"
> indent org-mode lists nicely. The longlines mode was removed from
> Emacs, and there should be a replacement for every usecase before
> you remove something I think. I believe visual-line-mod
Hallöchen!
Bastien writes:
> Torsten Bronger writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> And, shouldn't visual-line-mode's behaviour that it doesn't
>> respect the indentation of org-mode be considerd a bug, too?
>
> I don't think so, I believe this is an inherent limitation of
> visual-line-mode.
>
> The basic mean
Hi Torsten,
Torsten Bronger writes:
> But my point is that I don't want to
> have indentation of the subtrees, only of the list items. This
> basically means that org-indent-mode isn't the solution I am looking
> for.
Mhh.. Indeed.
> Besides, setting org-indent-indentation-per-level to "0"
Hallöchen!
Bastien writes:
> Torsten Bronger writes:
>
>> - There is no way to set the line width besides setting Emacs
>> margins, which is visually less appealing than before. (Minor
>> problem.)
>
> Please report this to Emacs developers.
In
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/201
Hi Torsten,
Torsten Bronger writes:
> - There is no way to set the line width besides setting Emacs
> margins, which is visually less appealing than before. (Minor
> problem.)
Please report this to Emacs developers.
> - Indentation in lists is essentially broken. I illustrate this by
> inden
Hallöchen!
For reasons I cannot understand, longlines-mode was dropped in bzr
emacs. Thus, I have to use visual-line-mode with org-mode in order
to achieve similar behaviour. This has two drawbacks:
- There is no way to set the line width besides setting Emacs
margins, which is visually less ap
