Hi Niclolas,
thanks for your answer and explaination.
· Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> "Holst Thomas (DGS-EC/ESE4)" writes:
>
>> Perhaps there is a misunderstanding.
>
> There was. Now I get it.
>
>> So it isn't about blocks. It is about LaTeX-fragments in org files.
>
> Actually, it isn
Hello,
"Holst Thomas (DGS-EC/ESE4)" writes:
> Perhaps there is a misunderstanding.
There was. Now I get it.
> So it isn't about blocks. It is about LaTeX-fragments in org files.
Actually, it isn't about LaTeX-fragments but entities. Your first line
contains a LaTeX-fragment: it appears (cor
Hello Nicolas,
thanks for your answer.
Perhaps there is a misunderstanding. In my original post
#+BEGIN_SRC org / #+END_SRC means context of an org file *not* inside a block.
#+BEGIN_SRC LaTeX / #+END_SRC is the content of the tex-file generated by the
exporters.
So it isn't about blocks. It
Hello,
Thomas Holst writes:
> So here is the next one:
> #+BEGIN_SRC org
> 160\(^\circ\}\nbsp{}C
> -11^{\circ}\nbsp{}C
> #+END_SRC
>
> With the old exporter this becomes:
> #+BEGIN_SRC latex
> 160\(^\circ\)~C
> -11$^{\circ}$~C
> #+END_SRC
> in LaTeX. Which looks well in pdf.
>
> With the
Da: Thomas Holst
Inviato: Mercoledì 18 Luglio 2012 12:13
> So here is the next one:
> #+BEGIN_SRC org
160\(^\circ\}\nbsp{}C
-11^{\circ}\nbsp{}C
> # +END_SRC
> With the new exporter it becomes:
> #+BEGIN_SRC latex
160\(^\circ\)~C
-11$^{\mathrm{\^{}}}$~C
> #+END_SRC
> in LaTeX. Where the
Hi,
forgive me if I am nagging :-). One of my collegues and myself want to
switch to new exporter. While testing the new exporter on our existing
org-files we encounter these problems.
So here is the next one:
#+BEGIN_SRC org
160\(^\circ\}\nbsp{}C
-11^{\circ}\nbsp{}C
#+END_SRC
With the old e
