Hi Nicolas,
On 2011-06-30, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> I think I have corrected a few glitches with font locking of inline
> footnotes. Your "a lot" makes me think it isn't enough yet, though...
They are really good now.
There was an interaction with comments and different extents were
colored wit
Hello,
Samuel Wales writes:
> Work well on 22. Really appreciate it. There are a lot of glitches
> with font lock of inline footnotes, not consistent. Even with the
> glitches I prefer the font lock.
I think I have corrected a few glitches with font locking of inline
footnotes. Your "a lot"
Samuel Wales writes:
> Work well on 22. Really appreciate it. There are a lot of glitches
> with font lock of inline footnotes, not consistent. Even with the
> glitches I prefer the font lock.
When you have some time, don't hesitate to point at those glitches.
A screenshot would be useful he
Work well on 22. Really appreciate it. There are a lot of glitches
with font lock of inline footnotes, not consistent. Even with the
glitches I prefer the font lock.
--
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
I support the Whittemore-Peterson Institute (WPI)
===
Bigotry agains
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> I've made some additional changes to the footnote branch, and fixed
> a merge conflict due to a recent patch.
>
> Since Org 7.6 is about to be released, I'd appreciate if someone using
> footnotes could test it and report back the results here. If some
> ser
Hi,
Tested on the test document you supplied earlier. Everything checks out.
Yours,
Christian
On 6/27/11 8:29 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
I've made some additional changes to the footnote branch, and fixed
a merge conflict due to a recent patch.
Since Org 7.6 is about to be released,
Hello,
Thanks for trying this.
Christian Moe writes:
> git pull
It should be git pull -f : I had to rebase.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Hi,
I get merge conflicts (see below), and this is not a good time to work
on improving my git skills (deadlines looming). If there's something
simple you can tell me to do, I'll try it. Otherwise I'll have to pass
on the testing, sorry.
Yours,
Christian
git checkout footnote-fix
git pull
Hello,
I've made some additional changes to the footnote branch, and fixed
a merge conflict due to a recent patch.
Since Org 7.6 is about to be released, I'd appreciate if someone using
footnotes could test it and report back the results here. If some
serious problem arises, its integration will
Hi Samuel,
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Samuel Wales wrote:
> I am eagerly awaiting these. Just curious for the git experts: are
> there git tricks to make it so we don't have to maintain a clone but
> instead a local branch?
>
$ cd org-mode/
$ git remote add nicolas git://orgmode.org/org-m
I am eagerly awaiting these. Just curious for the git experts: are
there git tricks to make it so we don't have to maintain a clone but
instead a local branch?
Hello,
I've updated some changes that should hopefully fix most issues reported
in this thread. git pull -f may be required.
The footnotes are completely fontified again.
Again, feedback is more than welcome.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Looking forward to these fixes. Thanks.
For me, fontifying the whole inline footnote would be useful. Just
the brackets might be better if the whole footnote would obscure
emphasis.
Samuel
--
The Kafka Pandemic:
http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2010/12/welcome-to-kafka-pandemic-two-for
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> First, a general consideration: my vote would be for highlighting the
>> entire footnote label, including the brackets. IMO, leaving the brackets
>> in the default face makes it more difficult to scan the buffer.
>> (Similarly, I think it might be nice to fontify the en
Hello,
Matt Lundin writes:
> First, a general consideration: my vote would be for highlighting the
> entire footnote label, including the brackets. IMO, leaving the brackets
> in the default face makes it more difficult to scan the buffer.
> (Similarly, I think it might be nice to fontify the en
Hi,
That should do it, all right.
Yours,
Christian
On 5/14/11 10:44 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
Christian Moe writes:
Anyway, the footnote markers are run together in LaTeX, too. So
I think a (customizable?) separator would be a reader-friendly
complement to this new adjacent footnot
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> I'd like to submit a branch for testing:
>
> git://github.com/ngz/org-mode-lists.git footnote-fix
>
> Here are the changes so far:
>
> - recognize and export inlined footnotes holding links in their definition,
> - recognize and export two or more
Hello,
Christian Moe writes:
> Anyway, the footnote markers are run together in LaTeX, too. So
> I think a (customizable?) separator would be a reader-friendly
> complement to this new adjacent footnote capability.
I've added three customizable variables for that:
- org-export-latex-footnote-se
On 5/12/11 12:04 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
Christian Moe writes:
* HTML: works!
One question: As is, adjoining footnotes `2' and `3' read as `23'.
Could/should the footnote export know to put a comma between
them:`2,3'?
For HTML purposes, I think not necessarily, the separator could
Hello,
Christian Moe writes:
> * HTML: works!
>
> One question: As is, adjoining footnotes `2' and `3' read as `23'.
> Could/should the footnote export know to put a comma between
> them:`2,3'?
>
> For HTML purposes, I think not necessarily, the separator could be
> flexibly added with CSS like:
Hi Christian,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:49, Christian Moe wrote:
> Nice! Tested only your snippet.
>
>
> * HTML: works!
>
> One question: As is, adjoining footnotes `2' and `3' read as `23'.
> Could/should the footnote export know to put a comma between them:`2,3'?
>
> For HTML purposes, I think
Hi,
Nice! Tested only your snippet.
* HTML: works!
One question: As is, adjoining footnotes `2' and `3' read as `23'.
Could/should the footnote export know to put a comma between them:`2,3'?
For HTML purposes, I think not necessarily, the separator could be
flexibly added with CSS like:
Hello,
I'd like to submit a branch for testing:
git://github.com/ngz/org-mode-lists.git footnote-fix
Here are the changes so far:
- recognize and export inlined footnotes holding links in their definition,
- recognize and export two or more footnotes in a row,
- don't chock at footnot
23 matches
Mail list logo
