Re: [O] [bug][babel] #+call: execution broken

2011-11-18 Thread Martyn Jago
Eric Schulte writes: > Martyn Jago writes: > >> Hi >> >> C-c C-c on a #+call: block() statement no longer causes the block to >> execute. >> >> This regression occurred on Nov 8th: >> >> commit a4273cbe0e0480bd02c59464cafb985951b1c5a2 >> Author: Eric Schulte >> Date: Tue Nov 8 19:42:59 2011 -

Re: [O] [bug][babel] #+call: execution broken

2011-11-17 Thread Eric Schulte
Martyn Jago writes: > Hi > > C-c C-c on a #+call: block() statement no longer causes the block to > execute. > > This regression occurred on Nov 8th: > > commit a4273cbe0e0480bd02c59464cafb985951b1c5a2 > Author: Eric Schulte > Date: Tue Nov 8 19:42:59 2011 -0700 > call lines are more careful a

[O] [bug][babel] #+call: execution broken

2011-11-17 Thread Martyn Jago
Hi C-c C-c on a #+call: block() statement no longer causes the block to execute. This regression occurred on Nov 8th: commit a4273cbe0e0480bd02c59464cafb985951b1c5a2 Author: Eric Schulte Date: Tue Nov 8 19:42:59 2011 -0700 call lines are more careful about being in example or verbatim blocks