Hi Eric,
Eric Schulte writes:
> Andreas Leha writes:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> thanks for looking into this providing a patch already!
>>
>>> I've just pushed up a patch which should speed up the collection of
>>> continued source blocks. Please let me know if the performance increase
>>> is suffic
Andreas Leha writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> thanks for looking into this providing a patch already!
>
>> I've just pushed up a patch which should speed up the collection of
>> continued source blocks. Please let me know if the performance increase
>> is sufficient for your example, if not we can look at
Hi Eric,
thanks for looking into this providing a patch already!
> I've just pushed up a patch which should speed up the collection of
> continued source blocks. Please let me know if the performance increase
> is sufficient for your example, if not we can look at more dramatic
> methods of opt
Hi Andreas,
I've just pushed up a patch which should speed up the collection of
continued source blocks. Please let me know if the performance increase
is sufficient for your example, if not we can look at more dramatic
methods of optimization or possibly at making the collection of such
blocks c
Hi all,
there is a significant performance drop connected to (the quite old) commit
8c37281cb63a0b5cb0d84d22960e3a33d7680d40
ob-tangle: continued code blocks now implemented with the :noweb-ref header arg
which introduces the continued code blocks.
On the test file ([fn:1] for the old syntax, [
