Re: [O] [RFC] Turn \[...\] constructs into full-fledged elements

2015-05-09 Thread Marcin Borkowski
On 2015-05-09, at 14:38, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> The point is to make \[...\] an element, which means that: >> >> - it cannot be inlined anymore, i.e., it has to start on a new line, >> - it cannot be filled anymore. >> >> So basically, \[...\] will be closer to L

Re: [O] [RFC] Turn \[...\] constructs into full-fledged elements

2015-05-09 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > The point is to make \[...\] an element, which means that: > > - it cannot be inlined anymore, i.e., it has to start on a new line, > - it cannot be filled anymore. > > So basically, \[...\] will be closer to LaTeX definition. Nitpick: I thought that \[...\] could be i

Re: [O] [RFC] Turn \[...\] constructs into full-fledged elements

2015-05-09 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Saturday, 9 May 2015 at 11:50, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: [...] > So basically, \[...\] will be closer to LaTeX definition. > > WDYT? I'm happy with this proposal. thanks, eric -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.50.1, Org release_8.3beta-1104-gbce77d

[O] [RFC] Turn \[...\] constructs into full-fledged elements

2015-05-09 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, I wasn't initially for such a change, but the more I think about it the more I think it makes sense. The point is to make \[...\] an element, which means that: - it cannot be inlined anymore, i.e., it has to start on a new line, - it cannot be filled anymore. So basically, \[...\] wi