Hello,
Sebastian Reuße writes:
> Fair enough. Thank you! FWIW, is there some handy table to consult on
> newly supported functions by Emacs version? Or do you have it all
> memorized from the Emacs changelogs?
When I encounter a suspicious function, i.e., a function I have hardly
seen before, I
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Sebastian Reuße writes:
>> It didn’t feel right copy-pasting the tests wholesale, so I made a
>> helper-macro. I checked the ert output by forcing a failure and the
>> failure explanation looks as expected. Does this work for you?
> Honestly, I still find it difficul
Hello,
Sebastian Reuße writes:
> Sure. Have a look at the follow-up patch and let me know what you
> think.
Thank you!
> It didn’t feel right copy-pasting the tests wholesale, so I made a
> helper-macro. I checked the ert output by forcing a failure and the
> failure explanation looks as expec
Hello Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Nitpick: Sections in test-org.el are sorted alphabetically. So the new
> "Refile" section could go between "Radio Targets" and "Sparse trees".
Thank you, I hadn’t noticed.
> Would it be possible to split this big test into smaller ones, with
> a descrip
Hello,
Sebastian Reuße writes:
> * testing/lisp/test-org.el: Add test.
> ---
Thank you.
> testing/examples/refile/a.org | 6 ++
> +
> +;;; org-refile
Nitpick: Sections in test-org.el are sorted alphabetically. So the new
"Refile" section could go between "Radio Targets" and "Sparse trees
* testing/lisp/test-org.el: Add test.
---
testing/examples/refile/a.org | 6 ++
testing/examples/refile/b.org | 6 ++
testing/lisp/test-org.el | 44 +++
3 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 testing/examples/refile/a.org
creat
