Re: [O] [PATCH] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift: Accept 0 clones

Kyle Meyer writes: > Thanks. Updated. Applied, with a minor tweak on tests so they don't fail on non-English systems. Thank you. Regards,

Re: [O] [PATCH] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift: Accept 0 clones

Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> -(if (not (and (integerp n) (> n 0))) >> +(if (not (and (integerp n) (>= n 0))) >> (user-error "Invalid number of replications %s" n)) > > Nitpick: (unless (wholenump n) (user-error ...)) Thanks. Updated. >From fe596d7d9a2687f8f553997e2a75fe40f1424ef3 Mon S

Re: [O] [PATCH] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift: Accept 0 clones

Hello, Kyle Meyer writes: > From 37a917e4f7e4d2c05355735ab08f1f555b9dc942 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Kyle Meyer > Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 21:46:54 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift: Accept 0 clones Thank you for the patch. > -(if (not (and (integerp n) (> n 0

[O] [PATCH] org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift: Accept 0 clones

Hello, I'd like to clone a subtree with a repeating timestamp so that the repeater is removed from the original subtree and a single shifted and repeating clone is created. I don't think this is currently possible with org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift. For example, running org-clone-subtree-wit