Re: [O] [PATCH] lisp/ob.el (org-babel-result-cond)

2012-12-11 Thread Eric Schulte
Achim Gratz writes: > Eric Schulte writes: >> I'd like to apply this patch, however the format is not detected by git >> am. Could you re-generate this patch using git format-patch and attach >> the resulting file? > > Here it is: > Much Obliged, I'll push this up when next I push to the git r

Re: [O] [PATCH] lisp/ob.el (org-babel-result-cond)

2012-12-11 Thread Achim Gratz
Eric Schulte writes: > I'd like to apply this patch, however the format is not detected by git > am. Could you re-generate this patch using git format-patch and attach > the resulting file? Here it is: >From d91ba35d143b806f9d615a93f34a10b4086f55a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Achim Gratz Dat

Re: [O] [PATCH] lisp/ob.el (org-babel-result-cond)

2012-12-11 Thread Eric Schulte
Achim Gratz writes: > This has been in there for a while and only been visible due to > byte-compiler warnings about free variable result-params. Either the > tests don't really exercise this code path well or we've been lucky that > result-params was bound to the correct value during all those

[O] [PATCH] lisp/ob.el (org-babel-result-cond)

2012-12-07 Thread Achim Gratz
This has been in there for a while and only been visible due to byte-compiler warnings about free variable result-params. Either the tests don't really exercise this code path well or we've been lucky that result-params was bound to the correct value during all those calls. --8<---cu