At Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:23:25 -0400,
Nick Dokos wrote:
>
> Sebastian Hofer wrote:
>
> > At Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:57:07 -0400,
> > Nick Dokos wrote:
> > >
> > > > At Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:05:28 -0400,
> > > > Nick Dokos wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > An empty
> > > > >
> > > > > #+AUTHOR:
> > > > >
>
Sebastian Hofer wrote:
> At Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:57:07 -0400,
> Nick Dokos wrote:
> >
> > > At Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:05:28 -0400,
> > > Nick Dokos wrote:
> > > >
> > > > An empty
> > > >
> > > > #+AUTHOR:
> > > >
> > > > disables the insertion of author (assuming that TITLE is not empty -
> > >
At Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:57:07 -0400,
Nick Dokos wrote:
>
> Sebastian Hofer wrote:
>
> > At Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:05:28 -0400,
> > Nick Dokos wrote:
> > >
> > > Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sebastian Hofer writes:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch addresses the prob
Sebastian Hofer wrote:
> At Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:05:28 -0400,
> Nick Dokos wrote:
> >
> > Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> >
> > > Sebastian Hofer writes:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > This patch addresses the problem of ambiguous conventions for the
> > > > placement of the title related macro
At Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:55:51 -0400,
Nick Dokos wrote:
>
> Nick Dokos wrote:
>
> > IIUC, the only remaining thing is the position of the \title etc macros
> > in the preamble or the body (or both).
> >
> > There are three categories of LaTeX classes: the ones that implement
> > Lamport's dictum
At Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:05:28 -0400,
Nick Dokos wrote:
>
> Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>
> > Sebastian Hofer writes:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This patch addresses the problem of ambiguous conventions for the
> > > placement of the title related macros (\author, \date,...) with
> > > respect to th
Nick Dokos wrote:
> IIUC, the only remaining thing is the position of the \title etc macros
> in the preamble or the body (or both).
>
> There are three categories of LaTeX classes: the ones that implement
> Lamport's dictum that \title etc can come anywhere before \maketitle,
> the ones like Re
Nick Dokos writes:
> Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>
>> Sebastian Hofer writes:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > This patch addresses the problem of ambiguous conventions for the
>> > placement of the title related macros (\author, \date,...) with
>> > respect to the main document body in different latex clas
Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> Sebastian Hofer writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch addresses the problem of ambiguous conventions for the
> > placement of the title related macros (\author, \date,...) with
> > respect to the main document body in different latex classes. It
> > introduces the foll
Sebastian Hofer writes:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch addresses the problem of ambiguous conventions for the
> placement of the title related macros (\author, \date,...) with
> respect to the main document body in different latex classes. It
> introduces the following changes:
>
> * org-exp.el:
>
I just now saw the FAQ entry on sending patches, sorry for that!
I'm reposting the patch with the proper mime-type. Hope it's correct this time!
Sebastian
diff --git a/lisp/org-exp.el b/lisp/org-exp.el
index d6ed193..e8086a6 100644
--- a/lisp/org-exp.el
+++ b/lisp/org-exp.el
@@ -618,6 +618,8 @@ t
Hi all,
This patch addresses the problem of ambiguous conventions for the
placement of the title related macros (\author, \date,...) with
respect to the main document body in different latex classes. It
introduces the following changes:
* org-exp.el:
- added the following options:
- tit
12 matches
Mail list logo