On Fr, Aug 14 2015, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Gerald Wildgruber writes:
>
>> One thing though: if I insert a new footnote in a region of text that
>> already has footnotes before and after, the auto adjust mechanism is
>> triggered by "C-c C-x f", but in this case point is set NOT near the NEW
>
Gerald Wildgruber writes:
> One thing though: if I insert a new footnote in a region of text that
> already has footnotes before and after, the auto adjust mechanism is
> triggered by "C-c C-x f", but in this case point is set NOT near the NEW
> footnote marker but always at the marker of the LAS
Thanks Matt and Nicolas!
I still have org-footnote-auto-adjust set to "t" and the positioning of
point near the footnote marker works now with the sources I checked out
this morning!
One thing though: if I insert a new footnote in a region of text that
already has footnotes before and after, th
Hello,
Matt Lundin writes:
> This patch should fix the issue. Testing is welcome.
Thanks for the patch.
However, `org-footnote-auto-adjust-maybe' needs to be called before
`org-edit-reference'. Otherwise, the footnote number in the remote
buffer is incorrect.
The marker information is not rel
@Matt Correct. I have set org-footnote-auto-adjust to t.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:16 PM Matt Lundin wrote:
> Matt Lundin writes:
>
> > Gerald Wildgruber writes:
> >
> >> Matt, thanks! looking forward to any elucidation you can give on the
> >> problem at hand!
> >
> > Could you tell me what t
Matt Lundin writes:
> Gerald Wildgruber writes:
>
>> Matt, thanks! looking forward to any elucidation you can give on the
>> problem at hand!
>
> Could you tell me what the value of org-footnote-auto-adjust is on your
> machine?
>
> It seems on my end that the problem only occurs when
> org-foot
