Re: [O] [PATCH] Allow inactive timestamps in org-expiry (copy of lost patch)

2011-05-24 Thread David Maus
At Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:55:13 -0400, Nick Dokos wrote: > > Marcel van der Boom wrote: > > > This patch is what is attached to the message displayed at [1]. I have > > been using this patch for a while and it works fine. From searching it > > looks like this patch was 'forgotten', but I may have ove

Re: [O] [PATCH] Allow inactive timestamps in org-expiry (copy of lost patch)

2011-03-28 Thread Marcel van der Boom
On ma 28-mrt-2011 14:55 Nick Dokos wrote: > The patch is now in patchwork (under your name), so it will be > addressed at some point. One question: there was a second patch in > the link you provided - should that be resubmitted as well? The patch I attached combined the two mentioned in the me

Re: [O] [PATCH] Allow inactive timestamps in org-expiry (copy of lost patch)

2011-03-28 Thread Nick Dokos
Marcel van der Boom wrote: > This patch is what is attached to the message displayed at [1]. I have > been using this patch for a while and it works fine. From searching it > looks like this patch was 'forgotten', but I may have overlooked > something. > > If the patch was rejected, you can igno

[O] [PATCH] Allow inactive timestamps in org-expiry (copy of lost patch)

2011-03-28 Thread Marcel van der Boom
Hi, Attached is a patch to org-expiry.el in contrib/lisp to allow a customization of the timestamps inserted by org-expiry for 'CREATED' and 'EXPIRED' properties. This patch is what is attached to the message displayed at [1]. I have been using this patch for a while and it works fine. From searc