Nick Dokos wrote:
> Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
>
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/47043 I've posted two
> > examples of local file definitions at the top of an org file which are
> > silently ignored for seemingly unrelated parts in the org file. The
> > de
Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/47043 I've posted two
> examples of local file definitions at the top of an org file which are
> silently ignored for seemingly unrelated parts in the org file. The
> definitions work if they are put at th
Never mind, Nick Dokos explained the behavior here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/47043/focus=47091
Cheers,
Viktor
Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/47043 I've posted two
> examples of local file definitions at the top of an
Hi everybody,
in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/47043 I've posted two
examples of local file definitions at the top of an org file which are
silently ignored for seemingly unrelated parts in the org file. The
definitions work if they are put at the end of the org file.
This inconsis