Eric Schulte writes:
> In general checking the manual before posting to the ML is a good idea.
You (voluntarily) write a meaningless one-liner and then complain I
wasted 10sec of you lifetime by not ReadingTFM - come on ...
--
cheers,
Thorsten
Nick Dokos writes:
> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> evaluating this 3 times does not work as expected:
>>
>> ,
>> | * A
>> |
>> | #+header: :results raw replace
>> | #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>> | (+ 2 2)
>> | #+end_src
>> |
>> | #+results:
>> | 4
>> | 4
>> | 4
>> `
>>
>>
Sebastien Vauban
writes:
> Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
>> Nick Dokos writes:
>>
>>> Thorsten Jolitz
>>> writes:
>>>
Hi List,
evaluating this 3 times does not work as expected:
,
| * A
|
| #+header: :results raw replace
| #+begin_src emacs-lisp
Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
> Nick Dokos writes:
>
>> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>>
>>> Hi List,
>>>
>>> evaluating this 3 times does not work as expected:
>>>
>>> ,
>>> | * A
>>> |
>>> | #+header: :results raw replace
>>> | #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>>> | (+ 2 2)
>>> | #+end_src
>>> |
>>> | #+resu
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
> Grant Rettke writes:
>
>> It sounds like you wanted the same thing that I did.
>>
>> What I wanted is something like running 'script' before starting a
>> REPL and just capturing the output and that is it. That output is not
>> being used to be inserted back into the do
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
> Have you found a way to get rid of those leading colons (maybe with a
> hook for post-processing the results before they are printed or so)?
No I have not. I'm not sure how to think about it yet.
Grant Rettke writes:
> It sounds like you wanted the same thing that I did.
>
> What I wanted is something like running 'script' before starting a
> REPL and just capturing the output and that is it. That output is not
> being used to be inserted back into the document or anything... it
> just ca
Nick Dokos writes:
> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> evaluating this 3 times does not work as expected:
>>
>> ,
>> | * A
>> |
>> | #+header: :results raw replace
>> | #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>> | (+ 2 2)
>> | #+end_src
>> |
>> | #+results:
>> | 4
>> | 4
>> | 4
>> `
>>
>>
It sounds like you wanted the same thing that I did.
What I wanted is something like running 'script' before starting a
REPL and just capturing the output and that is it. That output is not
being used to be inserted back into the document or anything... it
just captured the results of commands sen
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
> Hi List,
>
> evaluating this 3 times does not work as expected:
>
> ,
> | * A
> |
> | #+header: :results raw replace
> | #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> | (+ 2 2)
> | #+end_src
> |
> | #+results:
> | 4
> | 4
> | 4
> `
>
> Independent from argument order, 'replace'
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>> If you give the source code block a name, it should work as expected.
>
> Not over here - does it work for you?
No. Sorry for the noise.
All the best,
Tom
--
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com
Andreas Leha writes:
> Hi Thorsten,
>> My use-case is actually this, and it won't work with wrapped results:
>>
>> ,
>> | ** Utility Function :ARCHIVE:
>> |
>> | #+name: create-subtree-with-dblock
>> | #+header: :var name="foo"
>> | #+header: :var prms=":bar loo"
>> | #+header: :results rep
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>
>> Andreas Leha writes:
>>
>>> Hi Thorsten,
>>>
>>> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>>>
Hi List,
evaluating this 3 times does not work as expected:
,
| * A
|
| #+header: :results raw replace
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
> Andreas Leha writes:
>
>> Hi Thorsten,
>>
>> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>>
>>> Hi List,
>>>
>>> evaluating this 3 times does not work as expected:
>>>
>>> ,
>>> | * A
>>> |
>>> | #+header: :results raw replace
>>> | #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>>> | (+ 2 2)
>>> | #+end
Andreas Leha writes:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> evaluating this 3 times does not work as expected:
>>
>> ,
>> | * A
>> |
>> | #+header: :results raw replace
>> | #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>> | (+ 2 2)
>> | #+end_src
>> |
>> | #+results:
>> | 4
>> | 4
>>
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
> Hi List,
>
> evaluating this 3 times does not work as expected:
>
> ,
> | * A
> |
> | #+header: :results raw replace
> | #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> | (+ 2 2)
> | #+end_src
> |
> | #+results:
> | 4
> | 4
> | 4
> `
>
> Independent from argument ord
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
Hi Thomas,
> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> evaluating this 3 times does not work as expected:
>>
>> ,
>> | * A
>> |
>> | #+header: :results raw replace
>> | #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>> | (+ 2 2)
>> | #+end_src
>> |
>> | #+results:
>> |
Aloha Thorsten,
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
> Hi List,
>
> evaluating this 3 times does not work as expected:
>
> ,
> | * A
> |
> | #+header: :results raw replace
> | #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> | (+ 2 2)
> | #+end_src
> |
> | #+results:
> | 4
> | 4
> | 4
> `
>
> Independent from argument
Hi List,
evaluating this 3 times does not work as expected:
,
| * A
|
| #+header: :results raw replace
| #+begin_src emacs-lisp
| (+ 2 2)
| #+end_src
|
| #+results:
| 4
| 4
| 4
`
Independent from argument order, 'replace' (which should be default
anyway) is ignored.
--
cheers,
Th
19 matches
Mail list logo
