Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-26 Thread Rainer M Krug
Andreas Leha writes: > On the ess list (emacs.ess.general) there has been the > announcement [fn:2] of polymode [fn:1] recently, which is going in this > direction. True - sounds very much like what Eric mentioned. I poster a question there [1]to see if Vitalie could implement support for org mo

Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-25 Thread Andreas Leha
On the ess list (emacs.ess.general) there has been the announcement [fn:2] of polymode [fn:1] recently, which is going in this direction. Since my elisp knowledge is limited to the least, this comment might be irrelevant here, in which case please ignore it. Regards, Andreas Footnotes: [fn:1]

Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-25 Thread Rainer M Krug
Eric Schulte writes: While we are at editing code blocks inline (I also do this quite often). This might have been asked before, but in code blocks we have - syntax highlighting - indenting using the code block language settings but would it be pos

Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-25 Thread Eric Schulte
>>> >>> While we are at editing code blocks inline (I also do this quite often). >>> >>> This might have been asked before, but in code blocks we have >>> >>> - syntax highlighting >>> - indenting using the code block language settings >>> >>> but would it be possible to have, when the cursor i

Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-25 Thread Rainer M Krug
Carsten Dominik writes: > On 25.9.2013, at 08:53, Rainer M Krug wrote: > >> "Sebastien Vauban" >> writes: >> >>> Hi Carsten, >>> >>> Carsten Dominik wrote: On 24.9.2013, at 18:17, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > Carsten Dominik wrote: >> On 23.9.2013, at 09:40, Rainer M Krug wrote: >

Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-25 Thread Rainer M Krug
Carsten Dominik writes: > On 25.9.2013, at 08:48, Rainer M Krug wrote: > >> Carsten Dominik writes: >> >>> Hi Rainer, hi Carsten, >>> >>> it does not get lost - it is in my queue. As are, unfortunately, >>> another 35 threads with possible bugs. Help is definitely wanted. >> >> That's what

Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-25 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 25.9.2013, at 08:48, Rainer M Krug wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> Hi Rainer, hi Carsten, >> >> it does not get lost - it is in my queue. As are, unfortunately, >> another 35 threads with possible bugs. Help is definitely wanted. > > That's what I was looking for - confirmation th

Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-25 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 25.9.2013, at 08:53, Rainer M Krug wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" > writes: > >> Hi Carsten, >> >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> On 24.9.2013, at 18:17, Sebastien Vauban wrote: Carsten Dominik wrote: > On 23.9.2013, at 09:40, Rainer M Krug wrote: >> >> When starting to edit a

Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-24 Thread Rainer M Krug
"Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Hi Carsten, > > Carsten Dominik wrote: >> On 24.9.2013, at 18:17, Sebastien Vauban wrote: >>> Carsten Dominik wrote: On 23.9.2013, at 09:40, Rainer M Krug wrote: > > When starting to edit a code block via C-c ' everything works as expected > and th

Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-24 Thread Rainer M Krug
Carsten Dominik writes: > Hi Rainer, hi Carsten, > > it does not get lost - it is in my queue. As are, unfortunately, > another 35 threads with possible bugs. Help is definitely wanted. That's what I was looking for - confirmation that is in somebodys processing queue. Thanks Carsten. Unfortu

Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-24 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On 24.9.2013, at 18:17, Sebastien Vauban wrote: >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> On 23.9.2013, at 09:40, Rainer M Krug wrote: When starting to edit a code block via C-c ' everything works as expected and the code block is highlighted and an indir

Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-24 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 24.9.2013, at 18:17, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > Hello Carsten, > > Carsten Dominik wrote: >> On 23.9.2013, at 09:40, Rainer M Krug wrote: >>> >>> When starting to edit a code block via C-c ' everything works as expected >>> and the code block is highlighted and an indirect buffer is opened.

Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-24 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hello Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On 23.9.2013, at 09:40, Rainer M Krug wrote: >> >> When starting to edit a code block via C-c ' everything works as expected >> and the code block is highlighted and an indirect buffer is opened. >> >> When I click into the highlighted block, I an "send"

Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-24 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Rainer, hi Carsten, it does not get lost - it is in my queue. As are, unfortunately, another 35 threads with possible bugs. Help is definitely wanted. Please see below for my comments and a possible fix. On 23.9.2013, at 09:40, Rainer M Krug wrote: > I just resend this bug report which h

Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-24 Thread Rainer M Krug
Hi before this gets lost - I think this is an serious bug, as it can easily lead to data loss. Thanks, Rainer Rainer M Krug writes: > I just resend this bug report which has been confirmed by Ista Zahn. > > Updated via git ust now: > > Org-mode version 8.2 (release_8.2-14-ge5f16b @ > /Users/r

[O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer

2013-09-23 Thread Rainer M Krug
I just resend this bug report which has been confirmed by Ista Zahn. Updated via git ust now: Org-mode version 8.2 (release_8.2-14-ge5f16b @ /Users/rainerkrug/.emacs.d/org-mode/lisp/) When starting to edit a code block via C-c ' everything works as expected and the code block is highlighted and