On 2018/10/29 at 08:19, Tim Cross wrote:
> On reading your response, we are probably not as far apart as I first
> thought. However, we have now wondered into discussion which probably
> isn't appropriate for this list. It is now in the realms of something
> that would probably be better discussed
Tim Cross writes:
> On reading your response, we are probably not as far apart as I first
> thought. However, we have now wondered into discussion which probably
> isn't appropriate for this list. It is now in the realms of something
> that would probably be better discussed with a good bottle of
On reading your response, we are probably not as far apart as I first
thought. However, we have now wondered into discussion which probably
isn't appropriate for this list. It is now in the realms of something
that would probably be better discussed with a good bottle of red or a
nice cold beer!
On 2018/10/27 at 07:15, Tim Cross wrote:
> I have either misunderstood most of your position or I simply disagree
> with it - I'm not sure which.
maybe a mix of both? I hope it’s a misunderstandnment but if it’s not I
want to understand too so to get to a constructive agreement.
> - Much of what
Garreau, Alexandre writes:
> Sorry, just found out that interesting (to me) thread I shouldn’t have
> let go:
>
> On 2018-10-25 at 08:00, Tim Cross wrote:
>> Kaushal Modi writes:
>>> […]
>>> - b and i are not deprecated
>>> - b and strong are both valid but their use depends on the writer's
>>
Sorry, just found out that interesting (to me) thread I shouldn’t have
let go:
On 2018-10-25 at 08:00, Tim Cross wrote:
> Kaushal Modi writes:
>> […]
>> - b and i are not deprecated
>> - b and strong are both valid but their use depends on the writer's
>> context (but Org mode has just one mark f
