Daniele Pizzolli writes:
> I submitted my small test patch for a bug in babel/shell early this year
> (unfortunately I was not able to fix the bug). I still think that the
> test is valuable for inclusion. If not, please give feedback.
>
> See the original mail at: <87h7jhus7k.fsf@spx.local.exam
Max Nikulin writes:
> On 24/11/2021 20:11, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>>
>> - Generally, more and better tests would be welcome.
>
> There are some tests (test-org/org-sort-remove-invisible) lost in a
> lengthy thread
> https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/s5p88r$go9$1...@ciao.gmane.io/
> There is even
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Dear Fellow Orgers,
>
> Despite being not directly visible to users, Org mode testing suite is
> critical to maintain overall codebase stability. It helps to avoid
> unintentional breakages as we keep adding new features to Org.
[]
> - Generally, more and better tests
On 24/11/2021 20:11, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
- Generally, more and better tests would be welcome.
There are some tests (test-org/org-sort-remove-invisible) lost in a
lengthy thread
https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/s5p88r$go9$1...@ciao.gmane.io/
There is even updates.orgmode.org entry for them:
Dear Fellow Orgers,
Despite being not directly visible to users, Org mode testing suite is
critical to maintain overall codebase stability. It helps to avoid
unintentional breakages as we keep adding new features to Org.
Yet, writing tests is probably not the most exciting part for
volunteer cont
