On Sun, May 04 2025, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>>> (file+olp+datetree
>>> function-returning-file-path function-returning-list-of-strings)
>>
>> This form is actually supported. Just not documented. You can already
>> put a function there.
Oh, good to know!
Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> (file+olp+datetree
>> function-returning-file-path function-returning-list-of-strings)
>
> This form is actually supported. Just not documented. You can already
> put a function there.
I now clarified this (on main) in the docstring and in the manual.
http
Kristoffer Balintona writes:
> I've been using file+olp+datetree in my org-capture-templates and I
> really appreciate the recent enhancements made to datetrees.
>
> However, in my personal usage of fole+olp+datetree, I actually found the
> default possible target specifications lacking. As per t
Hi,
I've been using file+olp+datetree in my org-capture-templates and I
really appreciate the recent enhancements made to datetrees.
However, in my personal usage of fole+olp+datetree, I actually found the
default possible target specifications lacking. As per the docstring,
they are currently:
