Re: [FR] A more general case than footnotes

2023-11-03 Thread Karl Fogel
On 02 Nov 2023, Suhail Singh wrote: Karl Fogel writes: My original announcement post from a year ago [2] is a good place to get a quick overview of how oref.el works. ... [2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-humanities/2022-10/msg9.html From [2]: Thus, in "jones-interview.or

Re: [FR] A more general case than footnotes

2023-11-02 Thread Suhail Singh
Karl Fogel writes: > My original announcement post from a year ago [2] is a good place to get a > quick > overview of how oref.el works. > > ... > > [2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-humanities/2022-10/msg9.html >From [2]: > Thus, in "jones-interview.org" you might have this: > >

Re: [FR] A more general case than footnotes

2023-10-31 Thread Karl Fogel
Ihor Radchenko writes: Maske writes: I propose links to arbitrary points in different files. Furthermore, I think it would be a very nice new feature, probably more opinions than mine should be heard. See: - https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/118435e8-0b20-46fd-af6a-88de8e19f...@app.fastmail

Re: [FR] A more general case than footnotes

2023-10-14 Thread Maske
Hi Ihor It seems Rick gave a step towards the direction of links to points? It would seem that if the Search Option would be available for internal links, it would work. Then maybe we would just miss a convenient way for generating unique <>. Bests. On 09/10/2023 13:24, Ihor Radchenko wrote

[FR] A more general case than footnotes

2023-10-13 Thread Maske
Hi Ihor It seems Rick gave a step towards the direction of links to points? It would seem that if the Search Option would be available for internal links, it would work. Then maybe we would just miss a convenient way for generating unique <>. Bests. On 09/10/2023 13:24, Ihor Radchenko wrote

Re: [FR] A more general case than footnotes

2023-10-09 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Maske writes: > I propose links to arbitrary points in different files. > > Furthermore, I think it would be a very nice new feature, probably more > opinions than mine should be heard. See: - https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/118435e8-0b20-46fd-af6a-88de8e19f...@app.fastmail.com/ - https://li

Re: [FR] A more general case than footnotes

2023-10-08 Thread Maske
Hi, Ihor I overlooked the aspect of exporting. I propose links to arbitrary points in different files. Furthermore, I think it would be a very nice new feature, probably more opinions than mine should be heard. Thanks On 08/10/2023 11:18, Ihor Radchenko wrote: Maske writes: *[n:102@978-

Re: [FR] A more general case than footnotes

2023-10-08 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Maske writes: >>> >>> *[n:102@978-84-362-7195-9]* The hash character is important in orgmode. >> May you explain the purpose of @978-84-... part? >> You seem to assume that a footnote always has a single reference, >> which may or may not be the case in practice. > > If there would be more than o

Re: [FR] A more general case than footnotes

2023-10-07 Thread Maske
On 07/10/2023 15:21, Ihor Radchenko wrote: Maske writes: The headings could be in different files, yes. AFAIK, citations don't link two exact points. Footnotes do. Do you mean that you also want to jump back-and-forth between footnote definition in the another file and its footnote referenc

Re: [FR] A more general case than footnotes

2023-10-07 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Maske writes: > The headings could be in different files, yes. > > AFAIK, citations don't link two exact points. Footnotes do. Do you mean that you also want to jump back-and-forth between footnote definition in the another file and its footnote references? > I don't understand the option of "i

Re: [FR] A more general case than footnotes

2023-10-07 Thread Maske
Hi Ihor The headings could be in different files, yes. AFAIK, citations don't link two exact points. Footnotes do. I don't understand the option of "include", but I think it wouldn't be the case. I really think footnotes would be a particular case of this option. ** Reference in file A :PR

Re: [FR] A more general case than footnotes

2023-10-07 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Maske writes: > Could exist a more general case than footnotes? > > A kind of footnotes that work between different files? > > > Maybe the syntax could be [n:LABEL@ID] > > Where the ID would be the unique ID of the heading. > Example: > > > ** Reference > :PROPERTIES: > :ID:   978-84-362-719

[FR] A more general case than footnotes

2023-10-07 Thread Maske
Hi Could exist a more general case than footnotes? A kind of footnotes that work between different files? Maybe the syntax could be [n:LABEL@ID] Where the ID would be the unique ID of the heading. Example: ** Reference :PROPERTIES: :ID:   978-84-362-7195-9 :END: A “comment line” star