Go right ahead. Should I delay putting XOXO code into org.el then?
If you like. The current XOXO export is useful if all you have is an
outline.
True enough, of course. I'll keep it in then.
- Carsten
--
Carsten Dominik
Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek"
Universiteit van Amsterdam
On Apr 4, 2006, at 12:55, Nic wrote:
No... that's not quite what I've said. The reason that XOXO export is
good is because it's easy to transform later (say with XSLT but also
specialized SAX or SXML processes would work).
But I guess that transformation code would actually have to
be custom
On Apr 3, 2006, at 14:53, Nic wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nic,
if it is OK, I am going to include the XOXO exporter in the next test
release of Org-mode.
You may as well go ahead. I'll try and find time to update it to
include all the rest of org-modes output options
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nic,
>
> if it is OK, I am going to include the XOXO exporter in the next test
> release of Org-mode.
You may as well go ahead. I'll try and find time to update it to
include all the rest of org-modes output options.
> Any objections or new versi
