Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Re: [David O'Toole] Fwd: Re: org-publish future ?

2006-06-10 Thread Bastien
Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Yes, this is certainly true. ascii-to-xxx converters can certainly >> help you to write your first LaTeX document. However, they don't >> encourage to grow into that language at all, so to some extend th

[Emacs-orgmode] Re: [David O'Toole] Fwd: Re: org-publish future ?

2006-06-07 Thread Christian Schlauer
David O'Toole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2. More project planning support. I would like to be able to do Gantt >charts in HTML. It isn't org-mode, but it does Gantt charts in Emacs (and exports them to LaTeX): http://members.chello.at/rene.weichselbaum/etask.html>. Maybe a starting point?

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Re: [David O'Toole] Fwd: Re: org-publish future

2006-06-07 Thread Scott Otterson
How about using the agenda "list of files to include" selection method? Specifying files to be published is a similar problem so reusing the agenda method would be consistent in a way. It works pretty well too. Scott Chris wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: PS. On the subject of org-publi

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Re: [David O'Toole] Fwd: Re: org-publish future ?

2006-06-07 Thread David O'Toole
I will look into this and get back to you. "Chris wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 07/06/06, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> On Jun 6, 2006, at 18:02, Chris wallace wrote: >> >> > >> > PS. On the subject of org-publish (sort of), one of the things I like >> > most a

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Re: [David O'Toole] Fwd: Re: org-publish future ?

2006-06-07 Thread Chris wallace
On 07/06/06, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 6, 2006, at 18:02, Chris wallace wrote:>> PS. On the subject of org-publish (sort of), one of the things I like> most about org-mode is that I can have Readme.org files scattered over> a number of directories and have them all included

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Re: [David O'Toole] Fwd: Re: org-publish future ?

2006-06-07 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jun 6, 2006, at 18:02, Chris wallace wrote: PS.  On the subject of org-publish (sort of), one of the things I like most about org-mode is that I can have Readme.org files scattered over a number of directories and have them all included in the agenda.  However, org-publish assumes all or

Fwd: [Emacs-orgmode] Re: [David O'Toole] Fwd: Re: org-publish future ?

2006-06-06 Thread Chris wallace
Apologies, sent this just to Michael and not the whole list:-- Forwarded message --From: Chris wallace < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: 06-Jun-2006 17:01Subject: Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Re: [David O'Toole] Fwd: Re: org-publish future ?To: Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Re: [David O'Toole] Fwd: Re: org-publish future ?

2006-06-06 Thread Michael Olson
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, this is certainly true. ascii-to-xxx converters can certainly > help you to write your first LaTeX document. However, they don't > encourage to grow into that language at all, so to some extend they > are a dead end. I disagree. It would give

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Re: [David O'Toole] Fwd: Re: org-publish future ?

2006-06-06 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jun 6, 2006, at 15:54, Michael Olson wrote: Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: My interest in exporting Org-mode to more formats is quite limited. I am not using Org-mode to write books. And if I want to produce a book, moving away from the fantastic toolset for LaTeX available u

[Emacs-orgmode] Re: [David O'Toole] Fwd: Re: org-publish future ?

2006-06-06 Thread Michael Olson
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My interest in exporting Org-mode to more formats is quite limited. > I am not using Org-mode to write books. And if I want to produce a > book, moving away from the fantastic toolset for LaTeX available > under Emacs to something that limits my possi