Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:02 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: > > Nicolas: I get that you need more code to do this, but are there other > > practical consequences of allowing more than plain-text? > > The code I need to write does not count, really. It is 10 locs at most, >

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Nicolas Goaziou hat am 26.04.2021 23:11 geschrieben: Denis Maier writes: No, I was not talking about having multiple input files, but about

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

On Mon, Apr 26 2021, Denis Maier wrote: > No, I was not talking about having multiple input files, but about having > multiple bibliographies in the output doc. > Perhaps each filtered in some way: > > #+print_bibliography: [style] [filter1] > #+print_bibliography: [style] [filter2] > > Obviously

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Denis Maier writes: > No, I was not talking about having multiple input files, but about > having multiple bibliographies in the output doc. > Perhaps each filtered in some way: > > #+print_bibliography: [style] [filter1] > #+print_bibliography: [style] [filter2] > > Obviously, filter1 and filter

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Am 26.04.2021 um 22:33 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou: Denis Maier writes: Oh, and what do you think regarding the multiple bibliographies question? As far as Org is concerned, you can have multiple "bibliography" keywords, e.g., #+bibliography: file1.bib #+bibliography: file2.bib Internal

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Denis Maier writes: > Oh, and what do you think regarding the multiple bibliographies > question? As far as Org is concerned, you can have multiple "bibliography" keywords, e.g., #+bibliography: file1.bib #+bibliography: file2.bib Internally, the bibliography is stored as a list of absolut

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Oh, and what do you think regarding the multiple bibliographies question? Denis Am 26.04.2021 um 22:02 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou: Hello, "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: On this, on the other (big) wip-cite thread, Nicolas said the following: "A drawback with allowing emphasis there is that prefix an

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Am 26.04.2021 um 22:02 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou: Hello, "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: On this, on the other (big) wip-cite thread, Nicolas said the following: "A drawback with allowing emphasis there is that prefix and suffix become parsed data and not plain string anymore. As a consequence, search

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Hello, "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: > On this, on the other (big) wip-cite thread, Nicolas said the following: > > "A drawback with allowing emphasis there is that prefix and suffix become > parsed data and not plain string anymore. As a consequence, searching > through them, e.g., when looking for l

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 5:20 PM Denis Maier wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > great to see that there's been so much progress since this issue has > last been discussed! Looks really impressive so far. > > Two comments/questions: > > - I think it should be possible to use some markup in prefixes and suf

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Hi everyone, great to see that there's been so much progress since this issue has last been discussed! Looks really impressive so far. Two comments/questions: - I think it should be possible to use some markup in prefixes and suffixes. - Will this proposal allow multiple bibliographies? I thi

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 3:53 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Hello, > > "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: > > > Nicolas, > > > > Quick syntax question: > > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 7:34 PM Nicolas Goaziou > > wrote: > > > >> As a reminder, the full citation syntax is > >> > >> [cite/style:common prefi

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Hello, M. ‘quintus’ Gülker writes: > I sometimes use emphasis around citations, but since my citation > styles all use footnotes, I think there should be no problem with > this. For example, I would write something like this (I hope I got the > syntax right): > > This is a test sentence[fn:1

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Hello, "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: > Nicolas, > > Quick syntax question: > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 7:34 PM Nicolas Goaziou > wrote: > >> As a reminder, the full citation syntax is >> >> [cite/style:common prefix ;prefix -@key suffix; ... ; common suffix] > > Is the space you have here before t

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Nicolas, Quick syntax question: On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 7:34 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > As a reminder, the full citation syntax is > > [cite/style:common prefix ;prefix -@key suffix; ... ; common suffix] Is the space you have here before the semi-colon significant as part of the delimiter,

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

FYI, I started to implement a function to format the org-cite syntax here: https://github.com/bdarcus/bibtex-actions/pull/113 When finished, and org-cite merged, I plan to submit it for inclusion in bibtex-completion. Bruce

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Hi, Am 22. April 2021 um 01:34 Uhr +0200 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou: > A noteworthy difference with the last merge is that I removed the > opportunity to add some Org syntax (emphasis, sub/superscript…) in > prefixes or suffixes. It makes the code a bit simpler. Of course, I'm > open to discussion ab

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 9:14 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Now, I hope to see some work towards "oc-citeproc.el" (or any other > processor). We need it to push the limits of "oc.el", e.g., to decide if > it should provide more tools, or more breadth in its API. > > As stated already, I will be happ

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Hello, "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: > The haskell citeproc library has this: > > "a CiteprocOptions structure (which currently just allows you to set > whether citations are hyperlinked to the bibliography)" > > Would something like that make sense as an optional argument somewhere > here? Or would d

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021, 7:34 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > `:export-bibliography' > > Function rendering a bibliography. It is called with five arguments: a > list > of citations, a list of bibliography files, the style, as a string or > nil, > the export back-end, as a symbo

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 8:35 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Hello, > > "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: > > > Great! > > > > I just pulled down the branch. > > > > This is my first time trying to run off a development branch. > > > > I ran make from the root of the repo, and then: > > > > emacs -Q -l lisp/

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Hello, "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: > Great! > > I just pulled down the branch. > > This is my first time trying to run off a development branch. > > I ran make from the root of the repo, and then: > > emacs -Q -l lisp/org.elc > > ... but then get this error: > > load-with-code-conversion: Cannot ope

Re: (Not so) Short note about citations in Org

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 7:34 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > I just rebased "wip-cite-new" branch, which now includes citation > syntax, and an interface between external citation processors and the > rest of Org. I'll throw in a demo at the end of this message. TL;DR: > search for "Demo time". Grea

(Not so) Short note about citations in Org

Hello, I just rebased "wip-cite-new" branch, which now includes citation syntax, and an interface between external citation processors and the rest of Org. I'll throw in a demo at the end of this message. TL;DR: search for "Demo time". As a reminder, the full citation syntax is [cite/style:com