Re: May we have a variant of display-buffer-reuse-window that considers indirect buffers?

2025-02-24 Thread martin rudalics
> Martin, may you install your part of the patch for Emacs? Installed on master. Please check. martin

Re: May we have a variant of display-buffer-reuse-window that considers indirect buffers?

2025-02-22 Thread martin rudalics
> Martin, may you install your part of the patch for Emacs? > Once done, I will go ahead and commit my part of the change to the > development version of Org. I'll do that as soon as I've fixed my commit disorder. martin

Re: May we have a variant of display-buffer-reuse-window that considers indirect buffers?

2024-12-20 Thread martin rudalics
>> Hmmm... This is not really what 'display-buffer' is supposed to do. I >> have to disguise the fact that we wanted to display BUFFER. I attach a >> new patch. > > Now, when you said that, it does feel not right indeed. > > What I was concerned about is the situation my request originated from

Re: May we have a variant of display-buffer-reuse-window that considers indirect buffers?

2024-12-18 Thread martin rudalics
attached. >> > 1. If there is a window displaying BUFFER, switch to that window >> > 2. If there is a window that is an indirect buffer of BUFFER or that >> > shares the same base buffer with BUFFER, switch to that window >> >> I included the facility that if there is a window whose buff

Re: May we have a variant of display-buffer-reuse-window that considers indirect buffers?

2024-12-18 Thread martin rudalics
> To be 100% clear, let me try to restate exactly what I have in mind. > > I want to call something like > > (pop-to-buffer BUFFER > '((display-buffer-reuse-window display-buffer-pop-up-window) > (reuse-indirect . t))) > > 1. If there is a window displaying BUFFER, switch to that windo

Re: May we have a variant of display-buffer-reuse-window that considers indirect buffers?

2024-12-17 Thread martin rudalics
> May you please provide more information? AFAIK, `pop-to-buffer' will > search for exact buffer without considering its indirect buffers and > base buffer. Could you please tell us what you would like 'display-buffer' to do without referring to org-mode. IIUC you want it to automatically detect

Re: May we have a variant of display-buffer-reuse-window that considers indirect buffers?

2024-12-16 Thread martin rudalics
> It's possible to select the necessary window by using 'pop-to-buffer' > while displaying the non-selected window with a simple 'display-window'. 'display-buffer' I suppose. martin

[O] bug#9179: 24.0.50; Org-agenda window splitting does not use full frame when fraction set to 1.0

2011-10-13 Thread martin rudalics
> 1. M-: (setq org-agenda-window-frame-fractions '(1.0 . 1.0)) RET > 2. M-x org-agenda a > > Expected results: The *Org Agenda* buffer occupies the entire frame > Actual results: The *Org Agenda* buffer occupies the entire frame EXCEPT > for a five line window at the top of the frame Due to fact

[O] bug#9040: 24.0.50; wrong type argument: listp t when invoking org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c

2011-07-12 Thread martin rudalics
> I've discovered a problem with org-mode on the trunk version of emacs; > typing ctrl-c ctrl-c to add a tag results in "Wrong type argument: > listp, t". > > Here are steps to reproduce: > > (1) Place the following in a file named "foo.org" (not including the > lines of "=" signs.) > > ==