On 4/3/23 07:52, Marko Schuetz-Schmuck wrote:
Dear All,
I teach some software engineering courses and in each of them students
work on semester-long projects in teams. So far, have let them choose
their own tools for all the tasks (implementation language,
documentation tools, etc.). Personal
> On Mar 8, 2023, at 7:59 AM, Max Nikulin wrote:
>
> On 08/03/2023 07:29, Rob Sargent wrote:
>>> LuaLaTeX may be instructed to use fallback fonts, see e.g.
> ...
>>> To my taste it is too low level.
>> That I placed the unicode into the text was "too
> On Mar 8, 2023, at 3:09 AM, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
> wrote:
>
> On 3/6/23 Rob Sargent wrote:
>
>> I think I have to decide on one format and stick with it. I get bitten
>> by ODT/DOC transformations, not sure I like the default look of
>> LaTeX
On 3/7/23 08:54, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 06/03/2023 22:42, Rob Sargent wrote:
I have added a "boxed x" and "CHECK MARK" to my document, but they do
not get exported to pdf output.
LuaLaTeX may be instructed to use fallback fonts, see e.g.
https://list.orgmod
On 3/6/23 16:06, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Rob Sargent writes:
On 3/6/23 10:42, Rob Sargent wrote:
I settled for \ding{54}, but of course that doesn't work in the HTML
export. I
keep bumping in to this works-here-not-there in export. Quite
disappointing.
LaTeX is great, but not fo
On 3/6/23 10:42, Rob Sargent wrote:
On 3/6/23 10:37, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Rob Sargent writes:
I have added a "boxed x" and "CHECK MARK" to my document, but they
do not get exported to pdf output. They are in the .tex file, and do
go through to the HTML. So
On 3/6/23 10:37, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Rob Sargent writes:
I have added a "boxed x" and "CHECK MARK" to my document, but they do
not get exported to pdf output. They are in the .tex file, and do go
through to the HTML. So far I'm using these
packages
#+LaT
I have added a "boxed x" and "CHECK MARK" to my document, but they do
not get exported to pdf output. They are in the .tex file, and do go
through to the HTML. So far I'm using these packages
#+LaTeX_HEADER: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
#+LaTeX_HEADER: \usepackage{libertine}
#+LaTeX_HEAD
Looks to me like this only happens if the last word of the line is
"emphasized" and larger font.
I'm using emacs 28, org 9.5.5
#+OPTIONS: author:nil
#+OPTIONS: toc:nil
#+OPTIONS: date:nil
#+OPTIONS: ^:nil
#+LaTeX_HEADER: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
#+LaTeX_HEADER: \usepackage{libertine}
#+LATEX_H
On 8/20/22 05:54, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Rob Sargent writes:
Emacs 27.2, Org 9.4.4, Windows 10
When I have a list of ** headings with more than nine entries on export
to ODT the tenth and subsequent are broken: The first letter of the
heading is fully to the right hand margin and the
Emacs 27.2, Org 9.4.4, Windows 10
When I have a list of ** headings with more than nine entries on export
to ODT the tenth and subsequent are broken: The first letter of the
heading is fully to the right hand margin and the remainder is on the
next line. There's no problem with latex/pdf nor
Most servers have a plain text file (permissions 004) that let you add name
and pass and db
> On Oct 31, 2021, at 9:51 PM, Tim Cross wrote:
>
>
> Mike Gauland writes:
>
>> I often use an org file to record database queries, using sql source blocks.
>> I've been putting the database credent
> On Aug 15, 2021, at 7:02 PM, Ken Mankoff wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Thank you for the suggestions.
>
> I think the most elegant solution is to have a hook on GitHub that compiles
> the PDF on a remote server. But it takes a lot more work, because I don't
> necessarily have *everything* in G
> On Aug 13, 2021, at 7:53 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Aug 13, 2021, at 6:54 PM, Mark Barton wrote:
>>
>> Ken,
>>
>> You could consider using git-lfs, Large File Support. There is some setup
>> and then you can say track *.pdf and
> On Aug 13, 2021, at 6:54 PM, Mark Barton wrote:
>
> Ken,
>
> You could consider using git-lfs, Large File Support. There is some setup and
> then you can say track *.pdf and that will tell git to track the binary file
> in a more efficient way. I use this mailing for csv files that I wan
Yes, that’s the place to start (and finish in a FOSSy way)
> On Jun 26, 2021, at 9:29 AM, Brandon Taylor
> wrote:
>
> Okay, I got that working, but now I’ve run into another error complaining
> about a missing “soffice.” So that means I need to install either Apache
> OpenOffice or LibreOffic
On 6/24/21 11:43 AM, Christopher Dimech wrote:
I only proposed colour highlighing for mathematical snippets. Nothing else.
Or making org able to export to html even when one is using LaTeX blocks.
In that sense, it would act in ways similar to texinfo, using a single
source file to produce out
It appears to me that explicitly setting list order number is not
honoured by the odt export mechanism. The following works on latex
(list numbering starts at 7) but not on odt (list numbering starts at
one though the [@7] is stripped from the output (as expect)):
1. [@7](/facilities/) The
My apologies, I can no longer reproduce this. I'm not sure where I went
wrong.
On 10/10/20 4:14 AM, Richard Lawrence wrote:
Hi Rob,
Rob Sargent writes:
This construct causes a new page to be started
* head
** subhead
- bullet
... in which export backend? You say you are
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
