Am 24.03.2012 um 20:00 schrieb Nick Dokos:
> Martin Halder wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> trying to use a function to output a latex file using python with =
>> #+call.
>>
>> The example below does work but when pycalltest gets too big it just =
>>
Am 24.03.2012 um 20:00 schrieb Nick Dokos:
> Martin Halder wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> trying to use a function to output a latex file using python with =
>> #+call.
>>
>> The example below does work but when pycalltest gets too big it just =
>>
Hi all,
trying to use a function to output a latex file using python with #+call.
The example below does work but when pycalltest gets too big it just output
"nil".
When I call pycalltest directly with C-c C-c it works even with a big function.
Is there a size limit when I use #+call ?
Thanks
Am 19.03.2012 um 16:56 schrieb Nick Dokos:
> Russell Adams wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:01:42PM +0100, Martin Halder wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> question about table calculation. Found in the documentation that I could
>>> refer
Am 19.03.2012 um 16:32 schrieb Russell Adams:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:01:42PM +0100, Martin Halder wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> question about table calculation. Found in the documentation that I could
>> refer to e.g. first line after second hline with @II+2.
>
Hi all,
question about table calculation. Found in the documentation that I could refer
to e.g. first line after second hline with @II+2.
Would like to calculate sum = vsum(@I..@II) and tax = sum * 0.08
Am I doing sth wrong ?
Thanks for help,
Martin
| article | price |
|-+|
|
> Martin Halder writes:
>
>>> Martin Halder writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> was trying to use a table as input for a latex block. Is there a way to
>>>> directly reference parts of the table inside the
> Martin Halder writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> was trying to use a table as input for a latex block. Is there a way to
>> directly reference parts of the table inside the block or do I have to
>> specify each parameter as separate parameter ?
>>
&g
Hi all,
was trying to use a table as input for a latex block. Is there a way to
directly reference parts of the table inside the block or do I have to specify
each parameter as separate parameter ?
Thanks for help,
Martin
This is working:
#+tblname: data
| Name| John Doe |
| Address |
>> If we're not just looking for a neat workaround for some special cases
>> anymore, but looking at making org-tables aware of time-like strings
>> by default, a better strategy than to convert them into integers might
>> be to translate them into Calc time format and back again.
>>
>> After a
Hi again,
have traced it down to the following commit which introduces the problem
(thanks to bisect):
[3dd474575205d3808390fc6ea2d5feccdb3d4305] Tables: Make @< and $< point to
row/column 1 in a stable way
Was there a change in the format or is it really a bug ?
Thanks for help,
Martin
> fo
Hi all,
found some strange behavior which was working before as far as I remember.. I
am on commit 078c01b.
this is working correctly:
| 10 |
| 10 |
| 20 |
||
| 40 |
#+TBLFM: @>$1=vsum(@1..@3)
this one with relative indexing (@>-1) not: (value is changing every time the
formula is applied:
Hi Christian,
this is fantastic, already love lisp, thanks a lot.. now I have exactly what I
wanted.. additionally I needed the time format in industrial mode (1h = 100m =
100s), implemented in ihms.
Thanks,
Martin
| Date | Start | Lunch | Back | End | Sum | Ind |
|---
>> I was trying to generate a simple table with time format "hh:mm" and
>> auto calculate daily sum.. clocking working time was too much so I
>> thought this would be easy but ended up with the following.. it works
>> but is not beautiful (apply formula twice and same information
>> multiple times
Hi all,
some words of warning: this was written by an Emacs, Org, Lisp and Calc
newbie.. and congratulations on converting a vim user btw, org mode is great : )
I was trying to generate a simple table with time format "hh:mm" and auto
calculate daily sum.. clocking working time was too much so
15 matches
Mail list logo
