Re: [O] Bug: Archiving items with org-attach-archive-delete set to 'query' always asks for confirmation

2018-08-11 Thread Luciano Passuello
Hello Kyle, That worked perfectly for all my basic test cases. Thanks! On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:44 PM Kyle Meyer wrote: > > Luciano Passuello writes: > > > When I set org-attach-archive-delete to query, Org is supposed to ask > > me for confirmation when archiving ent

[O] Bug: Archiving items with org-attach-archive-delete set to 'query' always asks for confirmation

2018-08-10 Thread Luciano Passuello
Hello, When I set org-attach-archive-delete to query, Org is supposed to ask me for confirmation when archiving entries with attachments. However, I am always asked for confirmation, regardless if the item has attachments in the first place. This is to me clearly undesirable behavior. Looking at

Re: [O] Lint multiple files at once

2017-10-12 Thread Luciano Passuello
Nick Dokos wrote: > Luciano Passuello writes: > >> Hello all, >> >> I love org-lint, but I couldn't find an easy way to get a report on >> multiple files. >> I'd like to analyze all files in a folder, getting all problems found >> using a sin

[O] Lint multiple files at once

2017-10-11 Thread Luciano Passuello
Hello all, I love org-lint, but I couldn't find an easy way to get a report on multiple files. I'd like to analyze all files in a folder, getting all problems found using a single command. Any suggestions?

Re: [O] Insert heading above current one

2017-09-30 Thread Luciano Passuello
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > M-RET and C-RET/C-u M-RET are > different beasts, just don't expect them to behave exactly the same. And then you hit exactly the heart of our discussion right there. Im my line of reasoning, org-insert-heading and org-insert-heading-respe

Re: [O] Insert heading above current one

2017-09-30 Thread Luciano Passuello
Hello, On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > OTOH, if we force the previous behaviour, as you suggest, there is no > way to insert a new headline after the current subtree when point is at > the beginning of a headline. A feature is lost. Isn't that consistent with the regula

Re: [O] Insert heading above current one

2017-09-29 Thread Luciano Passuello
Hi, thanks for the replies! >> To add, I also think that the earlier behavior made sense, if the point is >> at bolp, insert before, else insert after. > > I think the current behaviour makes more sense, if the command is called > with an universal argument. Indeed, what would be the point of usin

[O] Insert heading above current one

2017-09-29 Thread Luciano Passuello
Hello everybody, first message here. According to org-insert-heading documentation: "If point is at the beginning of a heading, insert a new heading or a new headline above the current one." I like this behavior very much, and in orgmode 8.x, calling org-insert-heading at the beginning of a line