On Mon, May 05 2025, Kristoffer Balintona wrote:
> It would be nice if the top-level datetree in would simply
> be used if the function supplied for function-returning-list-of-strings
> returns nil.
Seems like the attached diff can accomplish this, though I'm not sure if
it'
Hi,
In my org-capture-templates, I use a function to return the outline path
of my datetree target:
(file+olp+datetree function-returning-list-of-strings)
However, in my desired workflow, sometimes the function I use for
function-returning-list-of-strings returns an outline path of nil; in
su
On Sun, May 04 2025, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>>> (file+olp+datetree
>>> function-returning-file-path function-returning-list-of-strings)
>>
>> This form is actually supported. Just not documented. You can already
>> put a function there.
Oh, good to know!
Hi,
I've been using file+olp+datetree in my org-capture-templates and I
really appreciate the recent enhancements made to datetrees.
However, in my personal usage of fole+olp+datetree, I actually found the
default possible target specifications lacking. As per the docstring,
they are currently:
On Sat, Dec 21 2024, Ashish Panigrahi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am fairly new to org and was wondering what are the common workflows that
> people follow for planning and scheduling with org-mode.
>
> Currently I have one file called agenda.org to which I write a top level
> header for the week that I'
On Tue, Nov 05 2024, Sébastien Gendre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have enabled the indirect follow-mode when the agenda start. Now, for
> each agenda item, I can see the selected item details and only it. Which
> is great.
>
> But I have multiple questions about it.
>
>
> When a task have drawers, they
