Thanks for the bump. Life stuff popped up and I got distracted by other
hacking too.
On Thu, Jun 19 2025, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>>> Thank you for the clarification. WDYT of the patches attached?
>>
>> See my comments below.
>> ...
>
> It has been a month.
> Kristoffer,
On Mon, Jun 09 2025, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Kristoffer Balintona writes:
>
>> So, to be clear, you find that having an org project/todo heading for
>> each email thread suffices, since (i) all todos in the same thread end
>> up under the same project which makes (ii
On Mon, Jun 09 2025, Christian Moe wrote:
> Kristoffer Balintona writes:
>
>> (N.B. Christian Moe elsewhere in this thread something that gave me
>> inspiration. As a notmuch user, I think it wouldn’t be too hard to add a
>> visual indicator on individual emails for whet
On Sun, Jun 08 2025, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Kristoffer Balintona writes:
>
>> My main problem with trying to use org-agenda for all tasks created from
>> emails is that the state and relevance of those emails may change
>> without the todos tied to them changing (unless
On Sun, Jun 08 2025, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> "Martin Edström" writes:
>
>> I'll conclude a yes on the feasibility analysis. I do wonder if it'd
>> make sense for Org itself to have such an API (think a thin wrapper
>> around org-element-parse-buffer results), because then org-agenda /
>> org-ql
On Sat, May 31 2025, Christian Moe wrote:
> What you describe ought to work, and I cannot reproduce the error. It
> works with `org-html-publish-to-html' for my website under Org 9.7 on
> Emacs 29.4, both with an old citeproc version and the newest from Melpa.
>
> Does it work if you provide the f
Hi,
I’ve recently tried testing out org-publish but ran into a hiccup that
I’ve isolated to my using the #+CITE_EXPORT keyword in some of my files.
(I can be sure since when I remove these lines, the export proceeds as
expected.) More specifically, although org-publish doesn’t error during
the exp
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 12:02 PM chris wrote:
> Org-node seems very interesting! I noticed that your [parser.el](https://
> github.com/meedstrom/org-mem/blob/main/org-mem-parser.el) is only about 600
> lines long, whereas Org-mode’s parser seems larger and possibly more
> scattered? Are they roug
On Sat, May 24 2025, hob...@poukram.net wrote:
> Kristoffer Balintona writes:
>
>> [... 19 lines elided]
>>>
>>> I've been using mu4e for a while now, but in my gnus email days I
>>> used gnorb, and I dearly miss those features in my current
>>&
On Wed, May 21 2025, Christian Moe wrote:
> Kristoffer Balintona writes:
>
>> My main problem with trying to use org-agenda for all tasks created from
>> emails is that the state and relevance of those emails may change
>> without the todos tied to them changing (unless
On Wed, May 21 2025, Rémi Letot wrote:
> Christian Moe writes:
>
>> Kristoffer Balintona writes:
>>
>> [... 8 lines elided]
>>
>> I don't have any cure-all workflow for this, but I can think of a
>> feature that would help facilitate it: e-mail
On Fri, May 23 2025, Matteo Valsasina wrote:
> Hi all,
> i use a simple and quite effortless setup which is ok with me:
> - mails are read in gnus
> - mailing lists have rule to be delivered in folder (as i can read them quite
> async)
> - other mails all goes to inbox
> - mine zero inbox meens a
Hi org community,
How have users of the org and Emacs community set up org-agenda and
org-capture with their Emacs email configuration? In the years I've used
notmuch and org-agenda, I've mostly relied on good email hygiene to keep
my inboxes from overflowing with irrelevant or unimportant emails.
Hi Ihor,
I apologize for the delay. I've been busy these last few days and also
encountered some technical difficulties with my device.
On Sun, May 11 2025, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Kristoffer Balintona writes:
>
>>> Why not just using nil value as you initially suggested?
&
On Sun, May 11 2025, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Kristoffer Balintona writes:
>
>> Thank you for the help. I've attached a diff for a set of proposed
>> changes. It has `org-capture-expand-olp' and
>> `org-capture-expand-headline' return the symbol 'file
Whoops, I forgot to include in my diff the small test I added. I've
attached the full diff here.
--
Best,
Kristoffer
diff --git a/lisp/org-capture.el b/lisp/org-capture.el
index 6d395406cf..f418e9fba9 100644
--- a/lisp/org-capture.el
+++ b/lisp/org-capture.el
@@ -205,24 +205,36 @@
(
On Thu, May 08 2025, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Kristoffer Balintona writes:
>
>> Currently, `org-find-olp' assumes that it is being passed a file path +
>> an outline path, but when the olp function returns nil, only a file path
>> is returned, so `org-find-olp'
On Mon, May 05 2025, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Kristoffer Balintona writes:
>
>> On Mon, May 05 2025, Kristoffer Balintona wrote:
>
>> It would be nice if the top-level datetree in would simply
>> be used if the function supplied for function-returning-lis
On Mon, May 05 2025, Kristoffer Balintona wrote:
> It would be nice if the top-level datetree in would simply
> be used if the function supplied for function-returning-list-of-strings
> returns nil.
Seems like the attached diff can accomplish this, though I'm not sure if
it'
Hi,
In my org-capture-templates, I use a function to return the outline path
of my datetree target:
(file+olp+datetree function-returning-list-of-strings)
However, in my desired workflow, sometimes the function I use for
function-returning-list-of-strings returns an outline path of nil; in
su
On Sun, May 04 2025, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>>> (file+olp+datetree
>>> function-returning-file-path function-returning-list-of-strings)
>>
>> This form is actually supported. Just not documented. You can already
>> put a function there.
Oh, good to know!
Hi,
I've been using file+olp+datetree in my org-capture-templates and I
really appreciate the recent enhancements made to datetrees.
However, in my personal usage of fole+olp+datetree, I actually found the
default possible target specifications lacking. As per the docstring,
they are currently:
On Sat, Dec 21 2024, Ashish Panigrahi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am fairly new to org and was wondering what are the common workflows that
> people follow for planning and scheduling with org-mode.
>
> Currently I have one file called agenda.org to which I write a top level
> header for the week that I'
On Tue, Nov 05 2024, Sébastien Gendre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have enabled the indirect follow-mode when the agenda start. Now, for
> each agenda item, I can see the selected item details and only it. Which
> is great.
>
> But I have multiple questions about it.
>
>
> When a task have drawers, they
24 matches
Mail list logo
