Nicolas Goaziou (2012-11-30 16:31:47 +0100) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer writes:
>
>> I expected to find some existing clocktable test I could base mine
>> upon, but it seems that there's none yet.
>
> Yes, Org is lacking in the regression tests
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (2012-11-28 17:11:46 +0100) wrote:
> Nicolas Goaziou (2012-11-28 13:47:32 +0100) wrote:
>
>> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer writes:
>>
>>> * lisp/org-clock.el (org-clock-get-table-data): Pass tstart and tend
>>> time strings through `org-m
Nicolas Goaziou (2012-11-28 13:47:32 +0100) wrote:
> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer writes:
>
>> * lisp/org-clock.el (org-clock-get-table-data): Pass tstart and tend
>> time strings through `org-matcher-time` to allow relative times besides
>> absolute ones, convert result t
te)
(save-excursion
(org-clock-sum ts te
(unless (null matcher)
--
1.7.10.4
--
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- https://elvil.net/
Achim Gratz (2012-11-14 20:44:55 +0100) wrote:
> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer writes:
>> Bastien (2012-11-13 23:02:40 +0100) wrote:
>>> I'm not sure what went wrong on your side but the patch
>>> has been applied here:
>>>
>>> h
Bastien (2012-11-13 23:02:40 +0100) wrote:
> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer writes:
>
>> However, I'm looking at the Git master branch and I see that the
>> patch hasn't actually been applied [there][1] yet (and the [original
>> thread][2] is from March). Is there any
atch
hasn't actually been applied [there][1] yet (and the [original
thread][2] is from March). Is there any problem with it? Am I looking
at the wrong repo?
[1]: http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/tree/lisp/org.el#n16359
[2]: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/54101
Thanks a lot,
--
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- https://elvil.net/
Michael Welle (2012-06-12 10:40:00 +0200) wrote:
> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer writes:
>
>> Kyle Machulis (2012-06-12 03:47:40 +0200) wrote:
>>
>>> (defadvice qdot/cfw:org-extract-summary (after cfw:org-extract-summary)
>>> "Remove tags and filenames from it
n
>> customise away the org file names that are shown with the calendar
>> entries? Mouse clicking on the entry brings me to the associated file,
>> so IMHO showing the file's name does not provide additional information.
--
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- https://elvil.net/
ll reminders and rebuild reminders for today from the agenda.
(defun bh/org-agenda-to-appt ()
(interactive)
(setq appt-time-msg-list nil)
(org-agenda-to-appt))
;; Rebuild the reminders everytime the agenda is displayed.
(add-hook 'org-finalize-agenda-hook 'bh/org-agenda-to-appt '
itle: $message"
done
8<
It should be executable and placed in your $PATH. On Debian/Ubuntu
you'll need the libnotify-bin and screen packages.
Customize appt-display-duration, appt-display-interval and
appt-message-warning-time to your liking, then run:
8<
(appt-activate +1)
(bh/org-agenda-to-appt)
8<
HTH,
--
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- http://elvil.net/
sing Emacs 23.3 and Org 7.5, both from Debian unstable.
Thanks a lot,
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg16143.html
--
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- http://ivan.lovesgazpacho.net/
David Maus (2010-11-07 20:25:59 +0100) wrote:
> At Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:26:55 +0100,
> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I've noticed that exporting an entry with at least two examples,
>> when limiting the export to the visible tree (i.e. C-c C-e v ),
>>
ing sample file triggers the problem:
8<
* Title
** Subtitle
Foo1.
#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
foo1
#+END_EXAMPLE
Foo2.
#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
foo2
#+END_EXAMPLE
8<
Please note that an additional example is appended after foo2 in the
exported file. I'm using Org version 7.01h.
Than
Nick Dokos (2010-10-13 22:52:02 +0200) wrote:
> The following patch should fix it:
Thanks for the patch, Nick!
--
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- http://ivan.lovesgazpacho.net/
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replie
confused with it. Can you post the HTML file inline?
Argh, I made an external attachment, sorry. Here you have the file:
8<
----8<----
--
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- http://ivan.lovesgazpacho.net/
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing lis
lem is that "foo&bar" in the original table gets exported as
"foo&bar", when it should be exported as "foo&bar" to avoid spoling
the HTML code.
I hope it's clear enough this time. :)
<<< message/external-body; name*=us-ascii'&
ion when
exporting standalone files. I'm using Org version 7.01h. I've attached
a sample HTML file with an OrgTbl table in it so you can check for
yourselves. Thanks!
<<< message/external-body; name*=us-ascii''~%2ftmp%2fprova.html; access-type=local-file: Unrecognized &g
o&bar
--
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- http://ivan.lovesgazpacho.net/
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
meet-up there.
>
> - [ ] I would come and listen
> - [ ] I would come and give a talk in the devroom
>
> [1] http://www.fosdem.org/2011/
> [2] http://www.fosdem.org/2011/call_for_devrooms
--
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- http://ivan.lovesgazpacho.net/
_
ve been having a
look at them. For instance, the OfflineIMAP and Google Maps modes also
look great. Keep the good work! :)
--
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- http://ivan.lovesgazpacho.net/
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to sen
"
>
> but no plot is generated. If I remove , the plot is
> generated but without interpreting the dates as dates.
>
> Can anyone see what I do wrong?
Today I faced the same problem and I fixed it by replacing
``timefmt:%Y-%m-%d`` with `
Carsten Dominik (2010-03-17 12:04:37 +0100) dixit::
> On Mar 17, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
>
> >Fixing the old behaviour is trivial: just remove the ``(?? .
> >"%3F")`` entry
> >from the ``org-link-escape-chars`` list in ``org.el``.
ell).
For the wishlist, it'd also be nice to exclude "#+FOO" options from
flyspelling, since they tend to get highlighted when writing non-English text.
Thanks a lot!
::
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- http://ivan.lovesgazpacho.net/
signature.asc
Descr
al question mark, respectively) and the user should know
best (especially if the URL was copied from a browser).
Fixing the old behaviour is trivial: just remove the ``(?? . "%3F")`` entry
from the ``org-link-escape-chars`` list in ``org.el``.
Cheers,
::
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- http:/
cross this behaviour? I think it's a bug which should be
fixed since it makes some URLs impossible to write. And according to that last
sentence, the solution doesn't seem too hard.
Thanks and cheers,
::
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- http://ivan.lovesgazpacho.net/
signature.asc
26 matches
Mail list logo