(:exports . "code")
(:tangle . "yes")
(:lexical . "no")
(:hlines . "no")
(:noweb . "no")
(:cache . "no")
(:session . "none"))
"" nil 2649 "(ref:%s)")
("emacs-lisp" "(let (blocks)\n (org-babel-map-src-blocks
(buffer-file-name)\n(push (org-babel-get-src-block-info 'light)\n
blocks))\n blocks) "
((:results . "pp replace")
(:exports . "code")
(:tangle . "yes")
(:lexical . "no")
(:hlines . "no")
(:noweb . "no")
(:cache . "no")
(:session . "none"))
"" nil 975 "(ref:%s)")
("emacs-lisp" "(org-babel-tangle)"
((:results . "silent")
(:exports . "code")
(:tangle . "yes")
(:lexical . "no")
(:hlines . "no")
(:noweb . "no")
(:cache . "no")
(:session . "none"))
"" nil 563 "(ref:%s)"))
#+end_example
Running the following block tangles correctly
#+name correct-tangle
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :results silent
(org-babel-tangle)
#+END_SRC
I apologize if this is difficult to read.
To summarize, my findings indicate that =org-babel-get-src-block-info= is
incorrectly processing or merging the properties of each block depending
on
how, or where, it is run.
I unfortunately don't have time right now to untangle this fully, but I
hope
this helps.
Best Regards,
Henry Blevins
d can add "TINYCHANGE" if you would prefer.
Regards,
Henry
From 564661f586501dd235f2dad6ece45d0100dc21a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Henry Blevins
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:56:48 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] test-ob-scheme.el: Add tests for scheme result types
* test-ob-scheme.el (t
Neil Jerram writes:
> But if I want the table output
>
> | 1 | 2 | 3 |
>
> will there still be a way to get it? (I'm sure I have org files that
> need this!)
This patch will not affect any of your existing org files unless you have
specified you want the block to output as 'verbatim', 'scalar' o
tting this.
Regards,
Henry Blevins
From f93f086cbb16926c883a31fe8ad796e0da8bc8f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Henry Blevins
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 14:38:47 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ob-scheme.el: Fix scheme blocks ignoring :results in
formatting
* ob-scheme.el (org-babel-execute:scheme): P
