On Wed, May 21 2025, Christian Moe wrote:
> Kristoffer Balintona writes:
>
>> My main problem with trying to use org-agenda for all tasks created from
>> emails is that the state and relevance of those emails may change
>> without the todos tied to them changing (unless I update it myself). In
>>
On Wed, May 21 2025, Rémi Letot wrote:
> Christian Moe writes:
>
>> Kristoffer Balintona writes:
>>
>> [... 8 lines elided]
>>
>> I don't have any cure-all workflow for this, but I can think of a
>> feature that would help facilitate it: e-mail backlinks. I.e., for the
>> message at point, I wan
On Fri, May 23 2025, Matteo Valsasina wrote:
> Hi all,
> i use a simple and quite effortless setup which is ok with me:
> - mails are read in gnus
> - mailing lists have rule to be delivered in folder (as i can read them quite
> async)
> - other mails all goes to inbox
> - mine zero inbox meens a
Hi
I've made the package org-mem (https://github.com/meedstrom/org-mem), which has
its own parser.
I'm wondering if it would be possible to write something similar to use Org's
own parse trees instead, since it does seem able to persist cache to disk.
Here's what I envision:
- Let's say at in
On mar, mag 20, 2025 at 08:19 Kristoffer Balintona
wrote:
> Hi org community,
>
> How have users of the org and Emacs community set up org-agenda and
> org-capture with their Emacs email configuration? In the years I've used
> notmuch and org-agenda, I've mostly relied on good email hygiene to k
