Next version of patch attached.
> 1. I run preview on the whole buffer
> 2. M-x list-timers shows the timer, and it is ugly:
> * 10.0s - #f(compiled-function () #
>
> [...]
>
> 10+ sec]
>- So, no closures please. Use normal named functions
Done. Only one entry per buff
Hi Adam,
* [2024-09-18 00:25] Adam Porter:
Hi Phil,
On 9/17/24 05:00, Phil Estival wrote:
Also, for org-sql-session (which sounds very useful), it would be good
to compare and contrast it with the package it's meant to supersede.
The following comparison was added to the readme file.
ob
And it is *with* the attachment.
Kind regards,
LRA
Sep 18, 2024, 02:26 by l...@phdk.org:
> Hello org-mode mailing list
>
> Long time, first time. This is just a tiny patch fixing a regression
> in org-persist--find-index that was missed in the 95f77669e0 bugfix. It
> affects
> calls to org-pe
I like that idea. It's consistent, uses "prior art", so to speak, and most
of all , archiving involves cutting the subtree, so it's a very similar
change to the buffer / structure.
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024, 07:44 Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Dan Drake writes:
>
> > "AFAIU, what you are struggling with i
Hi Phil,
On 9/17/24 05:00, Phil Estival wrote:
Also, for org-sql-session (which sounds very useful), it would be good
to compare and contrast it with the package it's meant to supersede.
The following comparison was added to the readme file.
ob-sql-mode :
- is very simple : forward the sql s
(Apologies for replying to this twice Ihor, forgot to reply-all last time.)
The linked video was from an emacs -q, so I have made no modifications to
display-buffer-alist, and my understanding is that emacs -q is equivalent
to an empty init file. If that's not correct, I'm not sure what kind of
re
Amol Vaidya writes:
> I have tested this with a clean installation of Emacs, where I
> installed Org mode 9.7, but I am still encountering the same behavior.
>
> For reference, I’ve attached a screen recording that demonstrates the
> issue. I’ve also verified that Org 9.7 is being used, as shown
Benjamin McMillan writes:
> I attach the patch here.
Thanks!
> However, I have two questions.
> First, I am not certain that I set up the repository correctly, because
> when I run "make test" it generates 55 unexpected failures. This without
> making any changes.
> (The patch submitted here do
Jens Lechtenboerger writes:
>>> Ideally, it would be nice to have tests as well.
>>
>> I added test cases in the attached patch.
>
> I amended the commit message. I hope this to be ready for inclusion.
Thanks!
Applied, onto main, with a small amendment to the commit message.
https://git.savanna
Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> I believe it is up to the file to opt-out of compilation.
>
> That's true, but .dir-locals is a special file. So, I expected Emacs to
> treat it specially during compilation as well. To not break old,
> no-longer-maintained packages, if nothing.
I guess the counter argu
Karthik Chikmagalur writes:
>> It means that you are scheduling every single preview batch to fire at
>> the same time. I think that the timers here should run sequentially -
>> (1) fire the first batch without delay; (2) wait org-link-preview-delay
>> and fire the next batch; (3) ...
>
> Done, a
Hi, Orgxperts
assume I have something like this:
** Some heading
:properties:
:foo: some value for foo
:bar: some value for bar
:end:
Now, when I do
(org-element-properties-mapc
(lambda (k v) (message "%s -> %s" k v))
(org-element-at-point))
I do see foo and bar (well, OK
I attach the patch here.
However, I have two questions.
First, I am not certain that I set up the repository correctly, because
when I run "make test" it generates 55 unexpected failures. This without
making any changes.
(The patch submitted here does not generate any new failures.)
Second, the e
Hi and thanks for replying!
Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
> I do think that having extended menus for org-open-at-point could be
> useful. Not by default, but, for example, with a prefix argument.
>
This is a good point, but of much larger scope than just replacing the
follower of the basic citation-
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
* [2024-09-11 05:01] Adam Porter:
Hi Phil,
A quick, initial suggestion: it would be good to reformat the Lisp code
in both projects, as I see several cases of incorrect indentation,
hanging parens, extra blank lines, etc, and some of them would make the
code hard to read. For my Lisp editi
16 matches
Mail list logo