Re: [PATCH] Highlight ANSI sequences in the whole buffer (was [PATCH] ANSI color on example blocks and fixed width elements)

2024-07-01 Thread Nathaniel Nicandro
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > >> Nathaniel Nicandro writes: >> >>> Feedback appreciated! >> >> Thanks for the update! >> ... >>> I've finally implemented a solution to what I've discussed previously, >> ... > > It has been a while since the last update in this thread. > Nat

Re: bash source code block: problem after ssh commands

2024-07-01 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Max Nikulin writes: >> I guess not on Windows (bug#71081). But otherwise I agree. > > It was for starting mailcap viewer and Windows was not an issue. bug#71081 is about shell-command-on-region, not about mailcap. (and pty may actually not matter there, because Windows' cmd.exe is not even POSIX

Re: bash source code block: problem after ssh commands

2024-07-01 Thread Max Nikulin
On 01/07/2024 16:51, Ihor Radchenko wrote: Max Nikulin writes: My experience is that it is not easy to start a process without a tty in Emacs. Eli will object. I guess not on Windows (bug#71081). But otherwise I agree. It was for starting mailcap viewer and Windows was not an issue. Altho

Re: [FR] :noweb-wrap header arg

2024-07-01 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Ihor Radchenko writes: >> Let me know what you think! > > Consider cases like > ... It has been over a month since the last message in this thread. Amy, may I know if you are still working on the patch? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at

Re: bash source code block: problem after ssh commands

2024-07-01 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Max Nikulin writes: I do not see a great benefit of re-implementing session support via actual terminal. (I think we agree here). >>> >>> `shell' and so comint allocates "actual" pty. >> >> Are you sure? > ... > 123454 pts/0Sl 0:16 \_ emacs -Q > 125104 pts/4Ss+0:00

Re: bash source code block: problem after ssh commands

2024-07-01 Thread Max Nikulin
On 30/06/2024 23:42, Ihor Radchenko wrote: Max Nikulin writes: On 30/06/2024 22:28, Ihor Radchenko wrote: I do not see a great benefit of re-implementing session support via actual terminal. (I think we agree here). `shell' and so comint allocates "actual" pty. Are you sure? ps wf PI