In December last year was a change introduced, that a file should not be
removed before
tangling (https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-orgmode/2021-05/msg00337.html).
In an older bug report
(https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-orgmode/2021-05/msg00337.html)
the decision was to remove the file before writing.
I
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
--
On 22.01.2024 19:59, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
gerard.vermeu...@posteo.net writes:
FR: would it be possible to resolve such links?
What is the purpose? Why not simply leaving the result name same as
the
source block?
I have Python "IN" blocks generating Python "OUT" blocks that may end
up
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> It has been a while since the last update in this thread.
> Ilya, do you need any help with the patch?
Hi, here is the updated patch.
>From 2385ba08a89f2966a6d71f92e8693e7def33e3fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ilya Chernyshov
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 01:33:56 +0600
Sub
Thank you for asking.
Yes, I would be interested.
I will prepare a patch.
Regards,
Sławomir Grochowski
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 4:47 PM Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
> >> What do you think?
> >
> > I think that your use-case is not necessarily common enough to change
> > the
Dear All,
I'm sending you some updates to the ORG manual.
I'm sorry there's a lot of changes in this one patch.
If it's too much, I think I could break the changes into two commits:
First, move the 'Checkboxes' section under 'TODO Items' to '2 Document
Structure' -> '2.6 Plain Lists' -> '2.6.2 Ch
On 22.01.2024 19:59, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
gerard.vermeu...@posteo.net writes:
FR: would it be possible to resolve such links?
What is the purpose? Why not simply leaving the result name same as
the
source block?
I have Python "IN" blocks generating Python "OUT" blocks that may end
up
