Re: certain files should not be folded

2023-11-24 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "FE" == Fraga, Eric writes: > On Friday, 24 Nov 2023 at 18:47, Uwe Brauer wrote: >> Since I am not sure what are precisely these VISIBILITY properties, > By VISIBILITY properties, I meant literally that: any properties > labelled as VISIBILITY. But obviously you don't have any! >> here is

Re: certain files should not be folded

2023-11-24 Thread Fraga, Eric
On Friday, 24 Nov 2023 at 18:47, Uwe Brauer wrote: > Since I am not sure what are precisely these VISIBILITY properties, By VISIBILITY properties, I meant literally that: any properties labelled as VISIBILITY. But obviously you don't have any! > here is one example file which works just fine f

Re: certain files should not be folded

2023-11-24 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "FE" == Fraga, Eric writes: > The default is to show everything. Do you have an VISIBILITY properties > in the file? Since I am not sure what are precisely these VISIBILITY properties, here is one example file --8<---cut here---start->8--- #+STARTUP: sho

Re: certain files should not be folded

2023-11-24 Thread Fraga, Eric
The default is to show everything. Do you have an VISIBILITY properties in the file? -- : Eric S Fraga, with org release_9.6.6-418-g294a4d in Emacs 30.0.50

certain files should not be folded

2023-11-24 Thread Uwe Brauer
Hi I tried to follow https://orgmode.org/manual/Initial-visibility.html and put, for example, #+STARTUP: nofold or #+STARTUP: showall or #+STARTUP: showeverything But it did not work I close and open the file, but all headers are folded, what do miss here. Thanks Uwe Brauer -- I str

Re: [BUG] org-babel-tangle may fail due to (org-babel-tangle-collect-blocks lang-re tangle-file) [9.6.9 ( @ /home/andrea/.emacs.d/elpa/org-9.6.9/)]

2023-11-24 Thread Andrea
Sorry Ihor for the long delay. I got the error again for the second source block in the attached file. That is a sample of my configuration. Hope this helps, Andrea example.org Description: Lotus Organizer On Fri 13 Oct 2023 at 11:56, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Andrea writes: > >> Thanks Iho