On 18/11/2023 05:07, Matt wrote:
Consider calling
bash -c bash /tmp/two-lines.sh
Matt, could you, please, describe what this command should do
accordingly to your expectations?
From my point of view it was a plain mistake in attempts to simulate
the issue outside of Emacs. There is no
Hi Ihor, org-mode community,
* Ihor Radchenko [2023-11-17; 08:32 GMT]:
> Gregor Zattler writes:
> Fixed, on main.
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=0740e62df
thank you very much, it now again works for me.
Ciao; Gregor
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 10:20:28 +0100 Ihor Radchenko wrote ---
> This has nothing to do with Emacs comint and this is also not a bug in
> Emacs
Ihor, there were two claims made in the original report. I was referring to
Claim 2. That deals with M-x shell and therefore comint-mode.
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> I think that the most reasonable approach to fontify ANSI sequences will
> be the following:
>
> 1. We will consider ANSI within (a) all greater elements and lesser
>elements that have RESULTS affiliated keyword (indicating that they
>are result of code block eva
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> David Masterson writes:
>
>> I see no mention of "~bzg/org" in worg-about.
>
> Would it help if we change it to
>
> It is made of numerous .org files from https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg.
>
> ?
Perhaps:
Follow the link https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg for information (inclu
Hi Matt, Ihor, Alain,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
>
>> At the most basic user level (i.e., non lisp aware), why is it not
>> necessarily a bug if "something" does the expected in an X terminal
>> but not in an emacs terminal? I think Matt and I (and others) are o
On Fri, Nov 17 2023, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> I was only able to reproduce your problem with ssh asking a password.
> We are discussing the reproduced case.
>
> If you see problems with
>
>#+begin_src bash :results output
>ssh coch...@fruc.u-strasbg.fr "echo foo>foo_file"
>echo "bar"
>
On Fri, Nov 17 2023 at 13:06, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Will O'Brien writes:
>
>> I think the recent addition of an error check (downgraded to warning) is
>> erroneously triggering for some aspects of agenda view. Should be
>> reproducible with this org file ...
>
> That trigger was valid - a fau
Will O'Brien writes:
> I think the recent addition of an error check (downgraded to warning) is
> erroneously triggering for some aspects of agenda view. Should be
> reproducible with this org file ...
That trigger was valid - a fault in logic.
Thanks for reporting!
Fixed, on main.
https://git.
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes on Fri 17 Nov 2023 09:22:
>
> > I think that I need to clarify here.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Well, thank you for _trying_: most of the discussion in this thread is
> way beyond my pay grade.
My reply was to Matthew, the current ob-shell maintai
Ihor Radchenko writes on Fri 17 Nov 2023 09:22:
> I think that I need to clarify here.
Thank you.
Well, thank you for _trying_: most of the discussion in this thread is
way beyond my pay grade.
At the most basic user level (i.e., non lisp aware), why is it not
necessarily a bug if "something"
David Masterson writes:
>> FYI, WORG is listed in "Repositories" right at https://sr.ht/~bzg/org/
>
> I see no mention of "~bzg/org" in worg-about.
> ... I think my lack of
> experience for many years is showing -- I didn't think to click on the
> ~bzg/worg link which would've told me about ~bzg/
Matt writes:
> Thank you for clarifying.
>
> > Anyway, this gives me the opportunity to come back to the question of
> > whether or not there is a problem with emacs itself (like some people
> > here thought), and if some message should be sent to some emacs list.
> > Again my argument was th
brizly writes:
>> Do I understand correctly that you tried to run M-x org-add-note from
>> a
>> non-Org file?
>>
>
> That is correct, perhaps my fault, but surprising to get a stacktrace?
`org-add-note' assumes that it is called from an Org buffer. So, as
you may expect, all kinds of unexpected
Am Freitag, dem 17.11.2023 um 08:19 + schrieb Ihor Radchenko:
> brizly writes:
>
> > i was in a java-project and [alt]-x "org-add-note", when the
> > warnings apperes an i should file bug, so here i am.
> >
> > (I was not using this function for a long time, perhaps there is
> > missing a co
Gregor Zattler writes:
> left or right
> ...
>
> while correctly this:
>
>
> left or right
>
> with
> Org mode version 9.6.10 (release_9.6.10 @
> /home/grfz/src/emacs-master--078cfe807295038fa321c9297e24de5145065622--2023-11-02T00-38+01-00
brizly writes:
> i was in a java-project and [alt]-x "org-add-note", when the
> warnings apperes an i should file bug, so here i am.
>
> (I was not using this function for a long time, perhaps there is
> missing a config for a folder?)
Do I understand correctly that you tried to run M-x org-add-
18 matches
Mail list logo
